GVA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 6.19% compared to Granite Construction's net margin of 4.63%. Granite Construction's return on equity of 10.88% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 14.75%.

Granite Construction has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5.08%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $14.67 which suggests that it could grow by 26%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Granite Construction, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Granite Construction.

Granite Construction has a beta of 1.410, which suggesting that the stock is 41.036% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.343%.

Granite Construction has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Granite Construction pays 52.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Granite Construction quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $191.2M. Granite Construction's net income of $79M is higher than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $8.9M. Notably, Granite Construction's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.80x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 13.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Granite Construction is 1.30x versus 1.07x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MasTec has a net margin of 6.19% compared to Granite Construction's net margin of 2.93%. Granite Construction's return on equity of 10.88% beat MasTec's return on equity of 3.24%.

Granite Construction has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5.08%. On the other hand MasTec has an analysts' consensus of $154.43 which suggests that it could grow by 11.57%. Given that MasTec has higher upside potential than Granite Construction, analysts believe MasTec is more attractive than Granite Construction.

Granite Construction has a beta of 1.410, which suggesting that the stock is 41.036% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasTec has a beta of 1.725, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.458%.

Granite Construction has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. MasTec offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Granite Construction pays 52.32% of its earnings as a dividend. MasTec pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Granite Construction quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than MasTec quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Granite Construction's net income of $79M is lower than MasTec's net income of $95.2M. Notably, Granite Construction's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.80x while MasTec's PE ratio is 123.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Granite Construction is 1.30x versus 0.89x for MasTec. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Construction Partners has a net margin of 6.19% compared to Granite Construction's net margin of 5.45%. Granite Construction's return on equity of 10.88% beat Construction Partners's return on equity of 12.82%.

Granite Construction has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5.08%. On the other hand Construction Partners has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.02%. Given that Construction Partners has higher upside potential than Granite Construction, analysts believe Construction Partners is more attractive than Granite Construction.

Granite Construction has a beta of 1.410, which suggesting that the stock is 41.036% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Construction Partners has a beta of 0.701, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.881%.

Granite Construction has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. Construction Partners offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Granite Construction pays 52.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Construction Partners pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Granite Construction quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Construction Partners quarterly revenues of $538.2M. Granite Construction's net income of $79M is higher than Construction Partners's net income of $29.3M. Notably, Granite Construction's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.80x while Construction Partners's PE ratio is 68.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Granite Construction is 1.30x versus 2.60x for Construction Partners. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southland Holdings has a net margin of 6.19% compared to Granite Construction's net margin of -31.58%. Granite Construction's return on equity of 10.88% beat Southland Holdings's return on equity of -45.97%.

Granite Construction has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5.08%. On the other hand Southland Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25.24%. Given that Southland Holdings has higher upside potential than Granite Construction, analysts believe Southland Holdings is more attractive than Granite Construction.

Granite Construction has a beta of 1.410, which suggesting that the stock is 41.036% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Granite Construction has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. Southland Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Granite Construction pays 52.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Southland Holdings pays out -0.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Granite Construction quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Southland Holdings quarterly revenues of $173.3M. Granite Construction's net income of $79M is higher than Southland Holdings's net income of -$54.7M. Notably, Granite Construction's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.80x while Southland Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Granite Construction is 1.30x versus 0.16x for Southland Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.