GLDD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Granite Construction has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net margin of 6.19%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 14.75% beat Granite Construction's return on equity of 10.88%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus price target of $14.67, signalling upside risk potential of 26%. On the other hand Granite Construction has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.08%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Granite Construction, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Granite Construction.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.343% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Granite Construction has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.036%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Granite Construction offers a yield of 0.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction pays out 52.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues are $191.2M, which are smaller than Granite Construction quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $8.9M is lower than Granite Construction's net income of $79M. Notably, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.38x while Granite Construction's PE ratio is 41.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is 1.07x versus 1.30x for Granite Construction. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orion Group Holdings has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net margin of 1.88%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 14.75% beat Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of -10.35%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus price target of $14.67, signalling upside risk potential of 26%. On the other hand Orion Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 46.05%. Given that Orion Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock, analysts believe Orion Group Holdings is more attractive than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.343% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.894, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.577%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orion Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues are $191.2M, which are smaller than Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $226.7M. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $8.9M is higher than Orion Group Holdings's net income of $4.3M. Notably, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.38x while Orion Group Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is 1.07x versus 0.33x for Orion Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sterling Infrastructure has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net margin of 10.33%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 14.75% beat Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 28.17%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus price target of $14.67, signalling upside risk potential of 26%. On the other hand Sterling Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.5%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.343% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.222, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.169%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sterling Infrastructure offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sterling Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues are $191.2M, which are smaller than Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues of $593.7M. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $8.9M is lower than Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $61.3M. Notably, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.38x while Sterling Infrastructure's PE ratio is 29.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is 1.07x versus 2.60x for Sterling Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tutor Perini has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net margin of -9.32%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 14.75% beat Tutor Perini's return on equity of -10.19%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus price target of $14.67, signalling upside risk potential of 26%. On the other hand Tutor Perini has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 61.6%. Given that Tutor Perini has higher upside potential than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock, analysts believe Tutor Perini is more attractive than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.343% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tutor Perini has a beta of 1.492, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.195%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tutor Perini offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tutor Perini pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues are $191.2M, which are smaller than Tutor Perini quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $8.9M is higher than Tutor Perini's net income of -$100.9M. Notably, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.38x while Tutor Perini's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is 1.07x versus 0.30x for Tutor Perini. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.