GLDD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of 13.76% compared to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net margin of 9.24%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 15.97% beat Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 37.57%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 24.59%. On the other hand Comfort Systems USA has an analysts' consensus of $514.17 which suggests that it could grow by 1.29%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Comfort Systems USA, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Comfort Systems USA.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.294, which suggesting that the stock is 29.383% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.506, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.61%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comfort Systems USA offers a yield of 0.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues are $242.9M, which are smaller than Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $33.4M is lower than Comfort Systems USA's net income of $169.3M. Notably, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.80x while Comfort Systems USA's PE ratio is 30.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is 1.02x versus 2.48x for Comfort Systems USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fluor has a net margin of 13.76% compared to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net margin of -6.05%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 15.97% beat Fluor's return on equity of 64.65%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 24.59%. On the other hand Fluor has an analysts' consensus of $47.45 which suggests that it could fall by -4.62%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Fluor.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.294, which suggesting that the stock is 29.383% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluor has a beta of 1.299, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.942%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fluor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues are $242.9M, which are smaller than Fluor quarterly revenues of $4B. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $33.4M is higher than Fluor's net income of -$241M. Notably, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.80x while Fluor's PE ratio is 4.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is 1.02x versus 0.52x for Fluor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orion Group Holdings has a net margin of 13.76% compared to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net margin of -0.75%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 15.97% beat Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of 2.24%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 24.59%. On the other hand Orion Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $11.13 which suggests that it could grow by 22.39%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Orion Group Holdings, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Orion Group Holdings.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.294, which suggesting that the stock is 29.383% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.995, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.475%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orion Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues are $242.9M, which are larger than Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $188.7M. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $33.4M is higher than Orion Group Holdings's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.80x while Orion Group Holdings's PE ratio is 181.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is 1.02x versus 0.40x for Orion Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sterling Infrastructure has a net margin of 13.76% compared to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net margin of 9.16%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 15.97% beat Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 35.76%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 24.59%. On the other hand Sterling Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of $256.33 which suggests that it could grow by 14.11%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.294, which suggesting that the stock is 29.383% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.375, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.468%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sterling Infrastructure offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sterling Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues are $242.9M, which are smaller than Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues of $430.9M. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $33.4M is lower than Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $39.5M. Notably, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.80x while Sterling Infrastructure's PE ratio is 26.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is 1.02x versus 3.31x for Sterling Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.