ROAD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 5.45% compared to Construction Partners's net margin of 4.63%. Construction Partners's return on equity of 12.82% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 14.75%.

Construction Partners has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.02%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $14.67 which suggests that it could grow by 26%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Construction Partners, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Construction Partners.

Construction Partners has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.881% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.343%.

Construction Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Construction Partners pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Construction Partners quarterly revenues are $538.2M, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $191.2M. Construction Partners's net income of $29.3M is higher than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $8.9M. Notably, Construction Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 68.50x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 13.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Construction Partners is 2.60x versus 1.07x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Granite Construction has a net margin of 5.45% compared to Construction Partners's net margin of 6.19%. Construction Partners's return on equity of 12.82% beat Granite Construction's return on equity of 10.88%.

Construction Partners has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.02%. On the other hand Granite Construction has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.08%. Given that Construction Partners has higher upside potential than Granite Construction, analysts believe Construction Partners is more attractive than Granite Construction.

Construction Partners has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.881% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Granite Construction has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.036%.

Construction Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Granite Construction offers a yield of 0.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Construction Partners pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction pays out 52.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Construction Partners quarterly revenues are $538.2M, which are smaller than Granite Construction quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Construction Partners's net income of $29.3M is lower than Granite Construction's net income of $79M. Notably, Construction Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 68.50x while Granite Construction's PE ratio is 41.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Construction Partners is 2.60x versus 1.30x for Granite Construction. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southland Holdings has a net margin of 5.45% compared to Construction Partners's net margin of -31.58%. Construction Partners's return on equity of 12.82% beat Southland Holdings's return on equity of -45.97%.

Construction Partners has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.02%. On the other hand Southland Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25.24%. Given that Southland Holdings has higher upside potential than Construction Partners, analysts believe Southland Holdings is more attractive than Construction Partners.

Construction Partners has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.881% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Construction Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Southland Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Construction Partners pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Southland Holdings pays out -0.57% of its earnings as a dividend.

Construction Partners quarterly revenues are $538.2M, which are larger than Southland Holdings quarterly revenues of $173.3M. Construction Partners's net income of $29.3M is higher than Southland Holdings's net income of -$54.7M. Notably, Construction Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 68.50x while Southland Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Construction Partners is 2.60x versus 0.16x for Southland Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tutor Perini has a net margin of 5.45% compared to Construction Partners's net margin of -9.32%. Construction Partners's return on equity of 12.82% beat Tutor Perini's return on equity of -10.19%.

Construction Partners has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.02%. On the other hand Tutor Perini has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 61.6%. Given that Tutor Perini has higher upside potential than Construction Partners, analysts believe Tutor Perini is more attractive than Construction Partners.

Construction Partners has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.881% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tutor Perini has a beta of 1.492, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.195%.

Construction Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tutor Perini offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Construction Partners pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tutor Perini pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Construction Partners quarterly revenues are $538.2M, which are smaller than Tutor Perini quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Construction Partners's net income of $29.3M is higher than Tutor Perini's net income of -$100.9M. Notably, Construction Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 68.50x while Tutor Perini's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Construction Partners is 2.60x versus 0.30x for Tutor Perini. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.