ROAD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 0.74% compared to Construction Partners's net margin of 13.76%. Construction Partners's return on equity of 9.38% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 15.97%.

Construction Partners has a consensus price target of $109.97, signalling upside risk potential of 6.07%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 30.78%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Construction Partners, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Construction Partners.

Construction Partners has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.942% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.294, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.383%.

Construction Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Construction Partners pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Construction Partners quarterly revenues are $571.7M, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $242.9M. Construction Partners's net income of $4.2M is lower than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $33.4M. Notably, Construction Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 88.61x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 11.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Construction Partners is 2.55x versus 0.97x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Granite Construction has a net margin of 0.74% compared to Construction Partners's net margin of -4.81%. Construction Partners's return on equity of 9.38% beat Granite Construction's return on equity of 11.94%.

Construction Partners has a consensus price target of $109.97, signalling upside risk potential of 6.07%. On the other hand Granite Construction has an analysts' consensus of $101.75 which suggests that it could grow by 14.24%. Given that Granite Construction has higher upside potential than Construction Partners, analysts believe Granite Construction is more attractive than Construction Partners.

Construction Partners has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.942% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Granite Construction has a beta of 1.337, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.74%.

Construction Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Granite Construction offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Construction Partners pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction pays out 18.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Construction Partners quarterly revenues are $571.7M, which are smaller than Granite Construction quarterly revenues of $699.5M. Construction Partners's net income of $4.2M is higher than Granite Construction's net income of -$33.7M. Notably, Construction Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 88.61x while Granite Construction's PE ratio is 37.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Construction Partners is 2.55x versus 1.11x for Granite Construction. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MYR Group has a net margin of 0.74% compared to Construction Partners's net margin of 2.8%. Construction Partners's return on equity of 9.38% beat MYR Group's return on equity of 5.71%.

Construction Partners has a consensus price target of $109.97, signalling upside risk potential of 6.07%. On the other hand MYR Group has an analysts' consensus of $171.0000 which suggests that it could grow by 4.66%. Given that Construction Partners has higher upside potential than MYR Group, analysts believe Construction Partners is more attractive than MYR Group.

Construction Partners has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.942% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MYR Group has a beta of 1.169, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.903%.

Construction Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MYR Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Construction Partners pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MYR Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Construction Partners quarterly revenues are $571.7M, which are smaller than MYR Group quarterly revenues of $833.6M. Construction Partners's net income of $4.2M is lower than MYR Group's net income of $23.3M. Notably, Construction Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 88.61x while MYR Group's PE ratio is 74.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Construction Partners is 2.55x versus 0.79x for MYR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southland Holdings has a net margin of 0.74% compared to Construction Partners's net margin of -1.9%. Construction Partners's return on equity of 9.38% beat Southland Holdings's return on equity of -55.72%.

Construction Partners has a consensus price target of $109.97, signalling upside risk potential of 6.07%. On the other hand Southland Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could grow by 45.89%. Given that Southland Holdings has higher upside potential than Construction Partners, analysts believe Southland Holdings is more attractive than Construction Partners.

Construction Partners has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.942% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Construction Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Southland Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Construction Partners pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Southland Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Construction Partners quarterly revenues are $571.7M, which are larger than Southland Holdings quarterly revenues of $239.5M. Construction Partners's net income of $4.2M is higher than Southland Holdings's net income of -$4.6M. Notably, Construction Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 88.61x while Southland Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Construction Partners is 2.55x versus 0.20x for Southland Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.