ORN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fluor has a net margin of -0.75% compared to Orion Group Holdings's net margin of -6.05%. Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of 2.24% beat Fluor's return on equity of 64.65%.

Orion Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.13, signalling upside risk potential of 22.39%. On the other hand Fluor has an analysts' consensus of $47.45 which suggests that it could fall by -4.62%. Given that Orion Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Orion Group Holdings is more attractive than Fluor.

Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.995, which suggesting that the stock is 0.475% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluor has a beta of 1.299, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.942%.

Orion Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fluor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Orion Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $188.7M, which are smaller than Fluor quarterly revenues of $4B. Orion Group Holdings's net income of -$1.4M is higher than Fluor's net income of -$241M. Notably, Orion Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 181.80x while Fluor's PE ratio is 4.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Orion Group Holdings is 0.40x versus 0.52x for Fluor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of -0.75% compared to Orion Group Holdings's net margin of 13.76%. Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of 2.24% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 15.97%.

Orion Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.13, signalling upside risk potential of 22.39%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.59%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Orion Group Holdings, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Orion Group Holdings.

Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.995, which suggesting that the stock is 0.475% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.294, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.383%.

Orion Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Orion Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $188.7M, which are smaller than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $242.9M. Orion Group Holdings's net income of -$1.4M is lower than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $33.4M. Notably, Orion Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 181.80x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 11.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Orion Group Holdings is 0.40x versus 1.02x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Granite Construction has a net margin of -0.75% compared to Orion Group Holdings's net margin of -4.81%. Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of 2.24% beat Granite Construction's return on equity of 11.94%.

Orion Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.13, signalling upside risk potential of 22.39%. On the other hand Granite Construction has an analysts' consensus of $101.75 which suggests that it could grow by 12.41%. Given that Orion Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Granite Construction, analysts believe Orion Group Holdings is more attractive than Granite Construction.

Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.995, which suggesting that the stock is 0.475% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Granite Construction has a beta of 1.337, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.74%.

Orion Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Granite Construction offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Orion Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction pays out 18.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $188.7M, which are smaller than Granite Construction quarterly revenues of $699.5M. Orion Group Holdings's net income of -$1.4M is higher than Granite Construction's net income of -$33.7M. Notably, Orion Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 181.80x while Granite Construction's PE ratio is 37.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Orion Group Holdings is 0.40x versus 1.13x for Granite Construction. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sterling Infrastructure has a net margin of -0.75% compared to Orion Group Holdings's net margin of 9.16%. Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of 2.24% beat Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 35.76%.

Orion Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.13, signalling upside risk potential of 22.39%. On the other hand Sterling Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of $256.33 which suggests that it could grow by 14.11%. Given that Orion Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, analysts believe Orion Group Holdings is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure.

Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.995, which suggesting that the stock is 0.475% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.375, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.468%.

Orion Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sterling Infrastructure offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Orion Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sterling Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $188.7M, which are smaller than Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues of $430.9M. Orion Group Holdings's net income of -$1.4M is lower than Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $39.5M. Notably, Orion Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 181.80x while Sterling Infrastructure's PE ratio is 26.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Orion Group Holdings is 0.40x versus 3.31x for Sterling Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.