SLND Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fastenal has a net margin of -31.58% compared to Southland Holdings's net margin of 15.61%. Southland Holdings's return on equity of -45.97% beat Fastenal's return on equity of 33.31%.

Southland Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25.24%. On the other hand Fastenal has an analysts' consensus of $66.88 which suggests that it could grow by 0.8%. Given that Southland Holdings has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe Southland Holdings is more attractive than Fastenal.

Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastenal has a beta of 0.996, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.399%.

Southland Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fastenal offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Southland Holdings pays -0.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal pays out 88.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Southland Holdings quarterly revenues are $173.3M, which are smaller than Fastenal quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Southland Holdings's net income of -$54.7M is lower than Fastenal's net income of $298.1M. Notably, Southland Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fastenal's PE ratio is 37.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Southland Holdings is 0.16x versus 5.76x for Fastenal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of -31.58% compared to Southland Holdings's net margin of 4.63%. Southland Holdings's return on equity of -45.97% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 14.75%.

Southland Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25.24%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $14.67 which suggests that it could grow by 26%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Southland Holdings, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Southland Holdings.

Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.343%.

Southland Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Southland Holdings pays -0.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Southland Holdings quarterly revenues are $173.3M, which are smaller than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $191.2M. Southland Holdings's net income of -$54.7M is lower than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $8.9M. Notably, Southland Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 13.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Southland Holdings is 0.16x versus 1.07x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Granite Construction has a net margin of -31.58% compared to Southland Holdings's net margin of 6.19%. Southland Holdings's return on equity of -45.97% beat Granite Construction's return on equity of 10.88%.

Southland Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25.24%. On the other hand Granite Construction has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.08%. Given that Southland Holdings has higher upside potential than Granite Construction, analysts believe Southland Holdings is more attractive than Granite Construction.

Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Granite Construction has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.036%.

Southland Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Granite Construction offers a yield of 0.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Southland Holdings pays -0.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction pays out 52.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Southland Holdings quarterly revenues are $173.3M, which are smaller than Granite Construction quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Southland Holdings's net income of -$54.7M is lower than Granite Construction's net income of $79M. Notably, Southland Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Granite Construction's PE ratio is 41.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Southland Holdings is 0.16x versus 1.30x for Granite Construction. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Construction Partners has a net margin of -31.58% compared to Southland Holdings's net margin of 5.45%. Southland Holdings's return on equity of -45.97% beat Construction Partners's return on equity of 12.82%.

Southland Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25.24%. On the other hand Construction Partners has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.02%. Given that Southland Holdings has higher upside potential than Construction Partners, analysts believe Southland Holdings is more attractive than Construction Partners.

Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Construction Partners has a beta of 0.701, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.881%.

Southland Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Construction Partners offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Southland Holdings pays -0.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Construction Partners pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Southland Holdings quarterly revenues are $173.3M, which are smaller than Construction Partners quarterly revenues of $538.2M. Southland Holdings's net income of -$54.7M is lower than Construction Partners's net income of $29.3M. Notably, Southland Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Construction Partners's PE ratio is 68.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Southland Holdings is 0.16x versus 2.60x for Construction Partners. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.