ASAN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Salesforce has a net margin of -21.37% compared to Asana's net margin of 15.68%. Asana's return on equity of -88.16% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.42%.

Asana has a consensus price target of $16.37, signalling upside risk potential of 14.1%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $352.53 which suggests that it could grow by 31.43%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Asana, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Asana.

Asana has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.377, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.665%.

Asana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Asana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asana quarterly revenues are $187.3M, which are smaller than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $9.8B. Asana's net income of -$40M is lower than Salesforce's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Asana's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Salesforce's PE ratio is 41.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asana is 4.50x versus 6.74x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -21.37% compared to Asana's net margin of 36.86%. Asana's return on equity of -88.16% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Asana has a consensus price target of $16.37, signalling upside risk potential of 14.1%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $512.04 which suggests that it could grow by 8.73%. Given that Asana has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Asana is more attractive than Microsoft.

Asana has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.397%.

Asana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Asana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asana quarterly revenues are $187.3M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Asana's net income of -$40M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Asana's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 36.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asana is 4.50x versus 13.03x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of -21.37% compared to Asana's net margin of 20.78%. Asana's return on equity of -88.16% beat Oracle's return on equity of 104.49%.

Asana has a consensus price target of $16.37, signalling upside risk potential of 14.1%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $180.58 which suggests that it could grow by 1.74%. Given that Asana has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Asana is more attractive than Oracle.

Asana has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.494%.

Asana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Asana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asana quarterly revenues are $187.3M, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Asana's net income of -$40M is lower than Oracle's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Asana's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oracle's PE ratio is 41.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asana is 4.50x versus 9.09x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of -21.37% compared to Asana's net margin of 3.04%. Asana's return on equity of -88.16% beat Workday's return on equity of 5.65%.

Asana has a consensus price target of $16.37, signalling upside risk potential of 14.1%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $298.41 which suggests that it could grow by 17.76%. Given that Workday has higher upside potential than Asana, analysts believe Workday is more attractive than Asana.

Asana has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.596%.

Asana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Asana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Asana quarterly revenues are $187.3M, which are smaller than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Asana's net income of -$40M is lower than Workday's net income of $68M. Notably, Asana's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workday's PE ratio is 139.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asana is 4.50x versus 7.82x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.