ASAN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Salesforce has a net margin of -33.08% compared to Asana's net margin of 17.09%. Asana's return on equity of -90.94% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.45%.

Asana has a consensus price target of $15.38, signalling downside risk potential of -11.96%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $364.05 which suggests that it could grow by 33.29%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Asana, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Asana.

Asana has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.418, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.813%.

Asana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Asana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asana quarterly revenues are $188.3M, which are smaller than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $10B. Asana's net income of -$62.3M is lower than Salesforce's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Asana's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Salesforce's PE ratio is 42.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asana is 5.54x versus 7.02x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -33.08% compared to Asana's net margin of 36.86%. Asana's return on equity of -90.94% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Asana has a consensus price target of $15.38, signalling downside risk potential of -11.96%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $508.96 which suggests that it could grow by 13.06%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Asana, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Asana.

Asana has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.148%.

Asana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Asana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asana quarterly revenues are $188.3M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Asana's net income of -$62.3M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Asana's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 34.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asana is 5.54x versus 12.45x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of -33.08% compared to Asana's net margin of 20.78%. Asana's return on equity of -90.94% beat Oracle's return on equity of 104.49%.

Asana has a consensus price target of $15.38, signalling downside risk potential of -11.96%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $178.12 which suggests that it could grow by 14.2%. Given that Oracle has higher upside potential than Asana, analysts believe Oracle is more attractive than Asana.

Asana has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.277, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.667%.

Asana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Asana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asana quarterly revenues are $188.3M, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Asana's net income of -$62.3M is lower than Oracle's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Asana's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oracle's PE ratio is 36.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asana is 5.54x versus 7.99x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of -33.08% compared to Asana's net margin of 3.04%. Asana's return on equity of -90.94% beat Workday's return on equity of 5.65%.

Asana has a consensus price target of $15.38, signalling downside risk potential of -11.96%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $298.06 which suggests that it could grow by 25.23%. Given that Workday has higher upside potential than Asana, analysts believe Workday is more attractive than Asana.

Asana has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.297, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.683%.

Asana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Asana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Asana quarterly revenues are $188.3M, which are smaller than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Asana's net income of -$62.3M is lower than Workday's net income of $68M. Notably, Asana's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workday's PE ratio is 131.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asana is 5.54x versus 7.37x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.