AI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Agilysys has a net margin of -69.93% compared to C3.ai's net margin of 2%. C3.ai's return on equity of -31.06% beat Agilysys's return on equity of 42.17%.

C3.ai has a consensus price target of $36.15, signalling upside risk potential of 1.24%. On the other hand Agilysys has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1.67%. Given that Agilysys has higher upside potential than C3.ai, analysts believe Agilysys is more attractive than C3.ai.

C3.ai has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agilysys has a beta of 0.930, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.042%.

C3.ai has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agilysys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. C3.ai pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys pays out 1.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

C3.ai quarterly revenues are $94.3M, which are larger than Agilysys quarterly revenues of $68.3M. C3.ai's net income of -$66M is lower than Agilysys's net income of $1.4M. Notably, C3.ai's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Agilysys's PE ratio is 39.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C3.ai is 12.78x versus 15.19x for Agilysys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Salesforce has a net margin of -69.93% compared to C3.ai's net margin of 16.17%. C3.ai's return on equity of -31.06% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.11%.

C3.ai has a consensus price target of $36.15, signalling upside risk potential of 1.24%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $394.98 which suggests that it could grow by 14.9%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than C3.ai, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than C3.ai.

C3.ai has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.388%.

C3.ai has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. C3.ai pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

C3.ai quarterly revenues are $94.3M, which are smaller than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $9.4B. C3.ai's net income of -$66M is lower than Salesforce's net income of $1.5B. Notably, C3.ai's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Salesforce's PE ratio is 56.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C3.ai is 12.78x versus 9.04x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -69.93% compared to C3.ai's net margin of 37.61%. C3.ai's return on equity of -31.06% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68%.

C3.ai has a consensus price target of $36.15, signalling upside risk potential of 1.24%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $508.55 which suggests that it could grow by 15.76%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than C3.ai, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than C3.ai.

C3.ai has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.139%.

C3.ai has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. C3.ai pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

C3.ai quarterly revenues are $94.3M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $65.6B. C3.ai's net income of -$66M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.7B. Notably, C3.ai's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 36.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C3.ai is 12.78x versus 12.91x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of -69.93% compared to C3.ai's net margin of 22.41%. C3.ai's return on equity of -31.06% beat Oracle's return on equity of 128.3%.

C3.ai has a consensus price target of $36.15, signalling upside risk potential of 1.24%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $196.55 which suggests that it could grow by 14.67%. Given that Oracle has higher upside potential than C3.ai, analysts believe Oracle is more attractive than C3.ai.

C3.ai has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.029, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.915%.

C3.ai has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. C3.ai pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

C3.ai quarterly revenues are $94.3M, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $14.1B. C3.ai's net income of -$66M is lower than Oracle's net income of $3.2B. Notably, C3.ai's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oracle's PE ratio is 41.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C3.ai is 12.78x versus 8.87x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.