AI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

UiPath has a net margin of -73.31% compared to C3.ai's net margin of -6.33%. C3.ai's return on equity of -33.53% beat UiPath's return on equity of -3.7%.

C3.ai has a consensus price target of $29.21, signalling upside risk potential of 9.86%. On the other hand UiPath has an analysts' consensus of $14.07 which suggests that it could grow by 5.71%. Given that C3.ai has higher upside potential than UiPath, analysts believe C3.ai is more attractive than UiPath.

C3.ai has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UiPath has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

C3.ai has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UiPath offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. C3.ai pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UiPath pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

C3.ai quarterly revenues are $108.7M, which are smaller than UiPath quarterly revenues of $356.6M. C3.ai's net income of -$79.7M is lower than UiPath's net income of -$22.6M. Notably, C3.ai's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while UiPath's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C3.ai is 8.82x versus 5.09x for UiPath. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of -73.31% compared to C3.ai's net margin of 24.22%. C3.ai's return on equity of -33.53% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 12.3%.

C3.ai has a consensus price target of $29.21, signalling upside risk potential of 9.86%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $100.19 which suggests that it could fall by -23.97%. Given that C3.ai has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, analysts believe C3.ai is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

C3.ai has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

C3.ai has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. C3.ai pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

C3.ai quarterly revenues are $108.7M, which are smaller than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $883.9M. C3.ai's net income of -$79.7M is lower than Palantir Technologies's net income of $214M. Notably, C3.ai's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 572.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C3.ai is 8.82x versus 105.29x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SoundHound AI has a net margin of -73.31% compared to C3.ai's net margin of -748.63%. C3.ai's return on equity of -33.53% beat SoundHound AI's return on equity of -74.79%.

C3.ai has a consensus price target of $29.21, signalling upside risk potential of 9.86%. On the other hand SoundHound AI has an analysts' consensus of $11.81 which suggests that it could grow by 16.84%. Given that SoundHound AI has higher upside potential than C3.ai, analysts believe SoundHound AI is more attractive than C3.ai.

C3.ai has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SoundHound AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

C3.ai has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SoundHound AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. C3.ai pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SoundHound AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

C3.ai quarterly revenues are $108.7M, which are larger than SoundHound AI quarterly revenues of $29.1M. C3.ai's net income of -$79.7M is lower than SoundHound AI's net income of $129.9M. Notably, C3.ai's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SoundHound AI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C3.ai is 8.82x versus 36.63x for SoundHound AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zeta Global Holdings has a net margin of -73.31% compared to C3.ai's net margin of -8.17%. C3.ai's return on equity of -33.53% beat Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58%.

C3.ai has a consensus price target of $29.21, signalling upside risk potential of 9.86%. On the other hand Zeta Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $25.75 which suggests that it could grow by 95.97%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than C3.ai, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than C3.ai.

C3.ai has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

C3.ai has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zeta Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. C3.ai pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeta Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

C3.ai quarterly revenues are $108.7M, which are smaller than Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $264.4M. C3.ai's net income of -$79.7M is lower than Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M. Notably, C3.ai's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zeta Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C3.ai is 8.82x versus 2.40x for Zeta Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.