PATH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Calix has a net margin of -6.33% compared to UiPath's net margin of -2.17%. UiPath's return on equity of -3.7% beat Calix's return on equity of -4.53%.

UiPath has a consensus price target of $14.30, signalling upside risk potential of 12.36%. On the other hand Calix has an analysts' consensus of $49.50 which suggests that it could fall by -3.51%. Given that UiPath has higher upside potential than Calix, analysts believe UiPath is more attractive than Calix.

UiPath has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Calix has a beta of 1.349, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.915%.

UiPath has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Calix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UiPath pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Calix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UiPath quarterly revenues are $356.6M, which are larger than Calix quarterly revenues of $220.2M. UiPath's net income of -$22.6M is lower than Calix's net income of -$4.8M. Notably, UiPath's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Calix's PE ratio is 605.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UiPath is 4.87x versus 4.10x for Calix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Olo has a net margin of -6.33% compared to UiPath's net margin of 2.24%. UiPath's return on equity of -3.7% beat Olo's return on equity of 0.49%.

UiPath has a consensus price target of $14.30, signalling upside risk potential of 12.36%. On the other hand Olo has an analysts' consensus of $9.25 which suggests that it could grow by 7.31%. Given that UiPath has higher upside potential than Olo, analysts believe UiPath is more attractive than Olo.

UiPath has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Olo has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

UiPath has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Olo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UiPath pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Olo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UiPath quarterly revenues are $356.6M, which are larger than Olo quarterly revenues of $80.7M. UiPath's net income of -$22.6M is lower than Olo's net income of $1.8M. Notably, UiPath's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Olo's PE ratio is 431.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UiPath is 4.87x versus 4.87x for Olo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SoundHound AI has a net margin of -6.33% compared to UiPath's net margin of -748.63%. UiPath's return on equity of -3.7% beat SoundHound AI's return on equity of -74.79%.

UiPath has a consensus price target of $14.30, signalling upside risk potential of 12.36%. On the other hand SoundHound AI has an analysts' consensus of $11.81 which suggests that it could grow by 20.17%. Given that SoundHound AI has higher upside potential than UiPath, analysts believe SoundHound AI is more attractive than UiPath.

UiPath has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SoundHound AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

UiPath has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SoundHound AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UiPath pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SoundHound AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UiPath quarterly revenues are $356.6M, which are larger than SoundHound AI quarterly revenues of $29.1M. UiPath's net income of -$22.6M is lower than SoundHound AI's net income of $129.9M. Notably, UiPath's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SoundHound AI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UiPath is 4.87x versus 35.62x for SoundHound AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of -6.33% compared to UiPath's net margin of -2.12%. UiPath's return on equity of -3.7% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -14.61%.

UiPath has a consensus price target of $14.30, signalling upside risk potential of 12.36%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 118.02%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than UiPath, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than UiPath.

UiPath has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.593, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.32%.

UiPath has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UiPath pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UiPath quarterly revenues are $356.6M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.2M. UiPath's net income of -$22.6M is lower than WidePoint's net income of -$724.1K. Notably, UiPath's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UiPath is 4.87x versus 0.23x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.