CFLT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Asure Software has a net margin of -24.92% compared to Confluent's net margin of -6.88%. Confluent's return on equity of -34.45% beat Asure Software's return on equity of -7.02%.

Confluent has a consensus price target of $28.27, signalling upside risk potential of 15.52%. On the other hand Asure Software has an analysts' consensus of $14.40 which suggests that it could grow by 45.9%. Given that Asure Software has higher upside potential than Confluent, analysts believe Asure Software is more attractive than Confluent.

Confluent has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Asure Software has a beta of 0.406, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.403%.

Confluent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Asure Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Asure Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Confluent quarterly revenues are $271.1M, which are larger than Asure Software quarterly revenues of $34.9M. Confluent's net income of -$67.6M is lower than Asure Software's net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Confluent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Asure Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent is 7.87x versus 2.12x for Asure Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cycurion has a net margin of -24.92% compared to Confluent's net margin of -264.82%. Confluent's return on equity of -34.45% beat Cycurion's return on equity of -159.42%.

Confluent has a consensus price target of $28.27, signalling upside risk potential of 15.52%. On the other hand Cycurion has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Confluent has higher upside potential than Cycurion, analysts believe Confluent is more attractive than Cycurion.

Confluent has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cycurion has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Confluent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cycurion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cycurion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Confluent quarterly revenues are $271.1M, which are larger than Cycurion quarterly revenues of $3.9M. Confluent's net income of -$67.6M is lower than Cycurion's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, Confluent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cycurion's PE ratio is 6.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent is 7.87x versus 0.28x for Cycurion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CID Holdco has a net margin of -24.92% compared to Confluent's net margin of --. Confluent's return on equity of -34.45% beat CID Holdco's return on equity of --.

Confluent has a consensus price target of $28.27, signalling upside risk potential of 15.52%. On the other hand CID Holdco has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Confluent has higher upside potential than CID Holdco, analysts believe Confluent is more attractive than CID Holdco.

Confluent has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CID Holdco has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Confluent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CID Holdco offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CID Holdco pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Confluent quarterly revenues are $271.1M, which are larger than CID Holdco quarterly revenues of --. Confluent's net income of -$67.6M is higher than CID Holdco's net income of --. Notably, Confluent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CID Holdco's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent is 7.87x versus -- for CID Holdco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PDF Solutions has a net margin of -24.92% compared to Confluent's net margin of -6.35%. Confluent's return on equity of -34.45% beat PDF Solutions's return on equity of 0.59%.

Confluent has a consensus price target of $28.27, signalling upside risk potential of 15.52%. On the other hand PDF Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $31.75 which suggests that it could grow by 50.12%. Given that PDF Solutions has higher upside potential than Confluent, analysts believe PDF Solutions is more attractive than Confluent.

Confluent has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PDF Solutions has a beta of 1.427, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.679%.

Confluent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PDF Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PDF Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Confluent quarterly revenues are $271.1M, which are larger than PDF Solutions quarterly revenues of $47.8M. Confluent's net income of -$67.6M is lower than PDF Solutions's net income of -$3M. Notably, Confluent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PDF Solutions's PE ratio is 705.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent is 7.87x versus 4.45x for PDF Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.