ZS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GitLab has a net margin of -1.92% compared to Zscaler's net margin of 15.08%. Zscaler's return on equity of -3.26% beat GitLab's return on equity of -7.4%.

Zscaler has a consensus price target of $225.77, signalling upside risk potential of 20.56%. On the other hand GitLab has an analysts' consensus of $80.09 which suggests that it could grow by 32.49%. Given that GitLab has higher upside potential than Zscaler, analysts believe GitLab is more attractive than Zscaler.

Zscaler has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 18.022% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GitLab has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zscaler has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GitLab offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zscaler pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GitLab pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zscaler quarterly revenues are $628M, which are larger than GitLab quarterly revenues of $196M. Zscaler's net income of -$12.1M is lower than GitLab's net income of $29.6M. Notably, Zscaler's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GitLab's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zscaler is 12.36x versus 13.77x for GitLab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MongoDB has a net margin of -1.92% compared to Zscaler's net margin of -1.85%. Zscaler's return on equity of -3.26% beat MongoDB's return on equity of -16.23%.

Zscaler has a consensus price target of $225.77, signalling upside risk potential of 20.56%. On the other hand MongoDB has an analysts' consensus of $379.30 which suggests that it could grow by 56.09%. Given that MongoDB has higher upside potential than Zscaler, analysts believe MongoDB is more attractive than Zscaler.

Zscaler has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 18.022% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MongoDB has a beta of 1.170, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.953%.

Zscaler has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MongoDB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zscaler pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MongoDB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zscaler quarterly revenues are $628M, which are larger than MongoDB quarterly revenues of $529.4M. Zscaler's net income of -$12.1M is lower than MongoDB's net income of -$9.8M. Notably, Zscaler's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MongoDB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zscaler is 12.36x versus 9.30x for MongoDB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of -1.92% compared to Zscaler's net margin of 19.78%. Zscaler's return on equity of -3.26% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 12.27%.

Zscaler has a consensus price target of $225.77, signalling upside risk potential of 20.56%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $43.90 which suggests that it could fall by -46.72%. Given that Zscaler has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, analysts believe Zscaler is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

Zscaler has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 18.022% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zscaler has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zscaler pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zscaler quarterly revenues are $628M, which are smaller than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $725.5M. Zscaler's net income of -$12.1M is lower than Palantir Technologies's net income of $143.5M. Notably, Zscaler's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 411.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zscaler is 12.36x versus 74.88x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SentinelOne has a net margin of -1.92% compared to Zscaler's net margin of -37.2%. Zscaler's return on equity of -3.26% beat SentinelOne's return on equity of -17.96%.

Zscaler has a consensus price target of $225.77, signalling upside risk potential of 20.56%. On the other hand SentinelOne has an analysts' consensus of $29.82 which suggests that it could grow by 31.42%. Given that SentinelOne has higher upside potential than Zscaler, analysts believe SentinelOne is more attractive than Zscaler.

Zscaler has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 18.022% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SentinelOne has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zscaler has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SentinelOne offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zscaler pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SentinelOne pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zscaler quarterly revenues are $628M, which are larger than SentinelOne quarterly revenues of $210.6M. Zscaler's net income of -$12.1M is higher than SentinelOne's net income of -$78.4M. Notably, Zscaler's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SentinelOne's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zscaler is 12.36x versus 9.14x for SentinelOne. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.