Financhill
Sell
41

ACA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$99.99
Seasonality move :
5.13%
Day range:
$98.13 - $100.05
52-week range:
$72.75 - $113.43
Dividend yield:
0.2%
P/E ratio:
38.03x
P/S ratio:
1.96x
P/B ratio:
2.00x
Volume:
58.5K
Avg. volume:
252.8K
1-year change:
19.9%
Market cap:
$4.9B
Revenue:
$2.3B
EPS (TTM):
$2.63

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
ACA
Arcosa
$685M $0.85 18.6% 39.29% $105.80
FLR
Fluor
$4.7B $0.76 15.97% -33.94% $57.75
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
$184.6M $0.18 16.22% -29.17% $14.67
ORN
Orion Group Holdings
$235M $0.07 35.5% -- --
RELT
Reliant Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure
$608M $1.68 9.9% 3.13% --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
ACA
Arcosa
$100.02 $105.80 $4.9B 38.03x $0.05 0.2% 1.96x
FLR
Fluor
$50.69 $57.75 $8.7B 35.20x $0.00 0% 0.55x
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
$11.64 $14.67 $783M 13.38x $0.00 0% 1.07x
ORN
Orion Group Holdings
$7.76 -- $301.9M -- $0.00 0% 0.33x
RELT
Reliant Holdings
$0.08 -- $1.3M 21.13x $0.00 0% 0.50x
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure
$174.89 -- $5.4B 29.54x $0.00 0% 2.60x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
ACA
Arcosa
33.69% 2.221 26.76% 2.67x
FLR
Fluor
33.15% 0.481 13.5% 1.72x
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
49.23% 3.641 58.24% 0.82x
ORN
Orion Group Holdings
16.42% 4.387 12.46% 1.31x
RELT
Reliant Holdings
162.44% 7.858 484.94% 0.14x
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure
31.05% 4.182 7.22% 1.27x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
ACA
Arcosa
$136.7M $54.3M 4.15% 5.41% 5.45% $100.6M
FLR
Fluor
$88M $51M 7.78% 12.15% 2.37% $279M
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
$36.2M $16.7M 7.39% 14.75% 8.84% -$11.5M
ORN
Orion Group Holdings
$27.1M $6.2M -7.69% -10.35% 3.51% $33.3M
RELT
Reliant Holdings
$218.9K -$870.7K -13.92% 44.89% -99.5% -$1.7M
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure
$129.8M $87.6M 18.6% 28.17% 16.01% $138.3M

Arcosa vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns ACA or FLR?

    Fluor has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 1.32%. Arcosa's return on equity of 5.41% beat Fluor's return on equity of 12.15%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACA
    Arcosa
    21.35% $0.34 $3.7B
    FLR
    Fluor
    2.15% $0.31 $3.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About ACA or FLR?

    Arcosa has a consensus price target of $105.80, signalling upside risk potential of 15.98%. On the other hand Fluor has an analysts' consensus of $57.75 which suggests that it could grow by 13.93%. Given that Arcosa has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Arcosa is more attractive than Fluor.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACA
    Arcosa
    5 0 0
    FLR
    Fluor
    6 4 0
  • Is ACA or FLR More Risky?

    Arcosa has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.547% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluor has a beta of 1.890, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.961%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACA or FLR?

    Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Fluor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 6.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor pays out 20.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACA or FLR?

    Arcosa quarterly revenues are $640.4M, which are smaller than Fluor quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Arcosa's net income of $16.6M is lower than Fluor's net income of $54M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.03x while Fluor's PE ratio is 35.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.96x versus 0.55x for Fluor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACA
    Arcosa
    1.96x 38.03x $640.4M $16.6M
    FLR
    Fluor
    0.55x 35.20x $4.1B $54M
  • Which has Higher Returns ACA or GLDD?

    Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 4.63%. Arcosa's return on equity of 5.41% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 14.75%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACA
    Arcosa
    21.35% $0.34 $3.7B
    GLDD
    Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
    18.95% $0.13 $837.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About ACA or GLDD?

    Arcosa has a consensus price target of $105.80, signalling upside risk potential of 15.98%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $14.67 which suggests that it could grow by 26%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Arcosa, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Arcosa.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACA
    Arcosa
    5 0 0
    GLDD
    Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
    1 0 0
  • Is ACA or GLDD More Risky?

    Arcosa has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.547% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.343%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACA or GLDD?

    Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 6.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACA or GLDD?

    Arcosa quarterly revenues are $640.4M, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $191.2M. Arcosa's net income of $16.6M is higher than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $8.9M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.03x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 13.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.96x versus 1.07x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACA
    Arcosa
    1.96x 38.03x $640.4M $16.6M
    GLDD
    Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
    1.07x 13.38x $191.2M $8.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns ACA or ORN?

    Orion Group Holdings has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 1.88%. Arcosa's return on equity of 5.41% beat Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of -10.35%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACA
    Arcosa
    21.35% $0.34 $3.7B
    ORN
    Orion Group Holdings
    11.94% $0.12 $170.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About ACA or ORN?

    Arcosa has a consensus price target of $105.80, signalling upside risk potential of 15.98%. On the other hand Orion Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 46.05%. Given that Orion Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Arcosa, analysts believe Orion Group Holdings is more attractive than Arcosa.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACA
    Arcosa
    5 0 0
    ORN
    Orion Group Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is ACA or ORN More Risky?

    Arcosa has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.547% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.894, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.577%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACA or ORN?

    Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Orion Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 6.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACA or ORN?

    Arcosa quarterly revenues are $640.4M, which are larger than Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $226.7M. Arcosa's net income of $16.6M is higher than Orion Group Holdings's net income of $4.3M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.03x while Orion Group Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.96x versus 0.33x for Orion Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACA
    Arcosa
    1.96x 38.03x $640.4M $16.6M
    ORN
    Orion Group Holdings
    0.33x -- $226.7M $4.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns ACA or RELT?

    Reliant Holdings has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Arcosa's net margin of -116.57%. Arcosa's return on equity of 5.41% beat Reliant Holdings's return on equity of 44.89%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACA
    Arcosa
    21.35% $0.34 $3.7B
    RELT
    Reliant Holdings
    24.36% -$0.06 $1.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About ACA or RELT?

    Arcosa has a consensus price target of $105.80, signalling upside risk potential of 15.98%. On the other hand Reliant Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arcosa has higher upside potential than Reliant Holdings, analysts believe Arcosa is more attractive than Reliant Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACA
    Arcosa
    5 0 0
    RELT
    Reliant Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is ACA or RELT More Risky?

    Arcosa has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.547% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliant Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACA or RELT?

    Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Reliant Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 6.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Reliant Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACA or RELT?

    Arcosa quarterly revenues are $640.4M, which are larger than Reliant Holdings quarterly revenues of $898.8K. Arcosa's net income of $16.6M is higher than Reliant Holdings's net income of -$1M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.03x while Reliant Holdings's PE ratio is 21.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.96x versus 0.50x for Reliant Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACA
    Arcosa
    1.96x 38.03x $640.4M $16.6M
    RELT
    Reliant Holdings
    0.50x 21.13x $898.8K -$1M
  • Which has Higher Returns ACA or STRL?

    Sterling Infrastructure has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 10.33%. Arcosa's return on equity of 5.41% beat Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 28.17%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACA
    Arcosa
    21.35% $0.34 $3.7B
    STRL
    Sterling Infrastructure
    21.86% $1.97 $1.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About ACA or STRL?

    Arcosa has a consensus price target of $105.80, signalling upside risk potential of 15.98%. On the other hand Sterling Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.5%. Given that Arcosa has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, analysts believe Arcosa is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACA
    Arcosa
    5 0 0
    STRL
    Sterling Infrastructure
    0 0 0
  • Is ACA or STRL More Risky?

    Arcosa has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.547% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.222, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.169%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACA or STRL?

    Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Sterling Infrastructure offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 6.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Sterling Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACA or STRL?

    Arcosa quarterly revenues are $640.4M, which are larger than Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues of $593.7M. Arcosa's net income of $16.6M is lower than Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $61.3M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.03x while Sterling Infrastructure's PE ratio is 29.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.96x versus 2.60x for Sterling Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACA
    Arcosa
    1.96x 38.03x $640.4M $16.6M
    STRL
    Sterling Infrastructure
    2.60x 29.54x $593.7M $61.3M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?

Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…

Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…

Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?

Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…

Stock Ideas

Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x

Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 25

Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.

Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 25

Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.

Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 25

Semler Scientific [SMLR] is up 15.37% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock