FIX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EMCOR Group has a net margin of 9.24% compared to Comfort Systems USA's net margin of 6.22%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 37.57% beat EMCOR Group's return on equity of 37.5%.

Comfort Systems USA has a consensus price target of $514.17, signalling downside risk potential of -3.89%. On the other hand EMCOR Group has an analysts' consensus of $508.14 which suggests that it could fall by -4.24%. Given that EMCOR Group has more downside risk than Comfort Systems USA, analysts believe Comfort Systems USA is more attractive than EMCOR Group.

Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.506, which suggesting that the stock is 50.61% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.230, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.952%.

Comfort Systems USA has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.28%. EMCOR Group offers a yield of 0.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Comfort Systems USA pays 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. EMCOR Group pays out 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than EMCOR Group quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Comfort Systems USA's net income of $169.3M is lower than EMCOR Group's net income of $240.7M. Notably, Comfort Systems USA's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.09x while EMCOR Group's PE ratio is 23.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comfort Systems USA is 2.61x versus 1.64x for EMCOR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ferguson Enterprises has a net margin of 9.24% compared to Comfort Systems USA's net margin of 5.38%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 37.57% beat Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 28.89%.

Comfort Systems USA has a consensus price target of $514.17, signalling downside risk potential of -3.89%. On the other hand Ferguson Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $229.20 which suggests that it could grow by 5.14%. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than Comfort Systems USA, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than Comfort Systems USA.

Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.506, which suggesting that the stock is 50.61% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.359%.

Comfort Systems USA has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.28%. Ferguson Enterprises offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Comfort Systems USA pays 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises pays out 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Comfort Systems USA's net income of $169.3M is lower than Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $410M. Notably, Comfort Systems USA's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.09x while Ferguson Enterprises's PE ratio is 27.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comfort Systems USA is 2.61x versus 1.45x for Ferguson Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Construction Partners has a net margin of 9.24% compared to Comfort Systems USA's net margin of 0.74%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 37.57% beat Construction Partners's return on equity of 9.38%.

Comfort Systems USA has a consensus price target of $514.17, signalling downside risk potential of -3.89%. On the other hand Construction Partners has an analysts' consensus of $109.97 which suggests that it could grow by 3.74%. Given that Construction Partners has higher upside potential than Comfort Systems USA, analysts believe Construction Partners is more attractive than Comfort Systems USA.

Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.506, which suggesting that the stock is 50.61% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Construction Partners has a beta of 0.971, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.942%.

Comfort Systems USA has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.28%. Construction Partners offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Comfort Systems USA pays 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Construction Partners pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Construction Partners quarterly revenues of $571.7M. Comfort Systems USA's net income of $169.3M is higher than Construction Partners's net income of $4.2M. Notably, Comfort Systems USA's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.09x while Construction Partners's PE ratio is 90.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comfort Systems USA is 2.61x versus 2.60x for Construction Partners. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPX Technologies has a net margin of 9.24% compared to Comfort Systems USA's net margin of 10.61%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 37.57% beat SPX Technologies's return on equity of 15.11%.

Comfort Systems USA has a consensus price target of $514.17, signalling downside risk potential of -3.89%. On the other hand SPX Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $174.50 which suggests that it could grow by 4.4%. Given that SPX Technologies has higher upside potential than Comfort Systems USA, analysts believe SPX Technologies is more attractive than Comfort Systems USA.

Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.506, which suggesting that the stock is 50.61% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.234, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.377%.

Comfort Systems USA has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.28%. SPX Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Comfort Systems USA pays 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. SPX Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than SPX Technologies quarterly revenues of $482.6M. Comfort Systems USA's net income of $169.3M is higher than SPX Technologies's net income of $51.2M. Notably, Comfort Systems USA's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.09x while SPX Technologies's PE ratio is 38.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comfort Systems USA is 2.61x versus 3.94x for SPX Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.