PEGA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Innodata has a net margin of 17.96% compared to Pegasystems's net margin of 13.35%. Pegasystems's return on equity of 39.42% beat Innodata's return on equity of 73.59%.

Pegasystems has a consensus price target of $101.12, signalling upside risk potential of 3.02%. On the other hand Innodata has an analysts' consensus of $64.40 which suggests that it could grow by 63.16%. Given that Innodata has higher upside potential than Pegasystems, analysts believe Innodata is more attractive than Pegasystems.

Pegasystems has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.811% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innodata has a beta of 2.751, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 175.146%.

Pegasystems has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Innodata offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pegasystems pays 10.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Innodata pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pegasystems quarterly revenues are $475.6M, which are larger than Innodata quarterly revenues of $58.3M. Pegasystems's net income of $85.4M is higher than Innodata's net income of $7.8M. Notably, Pegasystems's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.65x while Innodata's PE ratio is 37.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pegasystems is 5.56x versus 6.24x for Innodata. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jamf Holding has a net margin of 17.96% compared to Pegasystems's net margin of 0.32%. Pegasystems's return on equity of 39.42% beat Jamf Holding's return on equity of -6.6%.

Pegasystems has a consensus price target of $101.12, signalling upside risk potential of 3.02%. On the other hand Jamf Holding has an analysts' consensus of $17.91 which suggests that it could grow by 70.56%. Given that Jamf Holding has higher upside potential than Pegasystems, analysts believe Jamf Holding is more attractive than Pegasystems.

Pegasystems has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.811% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jamf Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Pegasystems has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Jamf Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pegasystems pays 10.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Jamf Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pegasystems quarterly revenues are $475.6M, which are larger than Jamf Holding quarterly revenues of $167.6M. Pegasystems's net income of $85.4M is higher than Jamf Holding's net income of $529K. Notably, Pegasystems's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.65x while Jamf Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pegasystems is 5.56x versus 2.10x for Jamf Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 17.96% compared to Pegasystems's net margin of 36.86%. Pegasystems's return on equity of 39.42% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Pegasystems has a consensus price target of $101.12, signalling upside risk potential of 3.02%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $509.92 which suggests that it could grow by 10.77%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Pegasystems, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Pegasystems.

Pegasystems has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.811% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.148%.

Pegasystems has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Pegasystems pays 10.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pegasystems quarterly revenues are $475.6M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Pegasystems's net income of $85.4M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Pegasystems's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.65x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 35.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pegasystems is 5.56x versus 12.73x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NCR Voyix has a net margin of 17.96% compared to Pegasystems's net margin of -2.76%. Pegasystems's return on equity of 39.42% beat NCR Voyix's return on equity of 183.3%.

Pegasystems has a consensus price target of $101.12, signalling upside risk potential of 3.02%. On the other hand NCR Voyix has an analysts' consensus of $14.29 which suggests that it could grow by 28.82%. Given that NCR Voyix has higher upside potential than Pegasystems, analysts believe NCR Voyix is more attractive than Pegasystems.

Pegasystems has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.811% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NCR Voyix has a beta of 1.531, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.078%.

Pegasystems has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. NCR Voyix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pegasystems pays 10.28% of its earnings as a dividend. NCR Voyix pays out 1.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pegasystems quarterly revenues are $475.6M, which are smaller than NCR Voyix quarterly revenues of $617M. Pegasystems's net income of $85.4M is higher than NCR Voyix's net income of -$17M. Notably, Pegasystems's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.65x while NCR Voyix's PE ratio is 1.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pegasystems is 5.56x versus 0.55x for NCR Voyix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.