INOD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Pegasystems has a net margin of 13.35% compared to Innodata's net margin of 17.96%. Innodata's return on equity of 73.59% beat Pegasystems's return on equity of 39.42%.

Innodata has a consensus price target of $64.40, signalling upside risk potential of 43.21%. On the other hand Pegasystems has an analysts' consensus of $104.96 which suggests that it could grow by 3.5%. Given that Innodata has higher upside potential than Pegasystems, analysts believe Innodata is more attractive than Pegasystems.

Innodata has a beta of 2.650, which suggesting that the stock is 164.976% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pegasystems has a beta of 1.115, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.452%.

Innodata has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pegasystems offers a yield of 0.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Innodata pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems pays out 10.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Innodata quarterly revenues are $58.3M, which are smaller than Pegasystems quarterly revenues of $475.6M. Innodata's net income of $7.8M is lower than Pegasystems's net income of $85.4M. Notably, Innodata's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.26x while Pegasystems's PE ratio is 49.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innodata is 7.11x versus 5.74x for Pegasystems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LiveRamp Holdings has a net margin of 13.35% compared to Innodata's net margin of -3.32%. Innodata's return on equity of 73.59% beat LiveRamp Holdings's return on equity of -0.09%.

Innodata has a consensus price target of $64.40, signalling upside risk potential of 43.21%. On the other hand LiveRamp Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $38.71 which suggests that it could grow by 18.43%. Given that Innodata has higher upside potential than LiveRamp Holdings, analysts believe Innodata is more attractive than LiveRamp Holdings.

Innodata has a beta of 2.650, which suggesting that the stock is 164.976% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LiveRamp Holdings has a beta of 1.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.411%.

Innodata has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LiveRamp Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innodata pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LiveRamp Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Innodata quarterly revenues are $58.3M, which are smaller than LiveRamp Holdings quarterly revenues of $188.7M. Innodata's net income of $7.8M is higher than LiveRamp Holdings's net income of -$6.3M. Notably, Innodata's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.26x while LiveRamp Holdings's PE ratio is 2,807.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innodata is 7.11x versus 2.92x for LiveRamp Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snowflake has a net margin of 13.35% compared to Innodata's net margin of -41.27%. Innodata's return on equity of 73.59% beat Snowflake's return on equity of -40.99%.

Innodata has a consensus price target of $64.40, signalling upside risk potential of 43.21%. On the other hand Snowflake has an analysts' consensus of $223.36 which suggests that it could grow by 5.88%. Given that Innodata has higher upside potential than Snowflake, analysts believe Innodata is more attractive than Snowflake.

Innodata has a beta of 2.650, which suggesting that the stock is 164.976% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Innodata has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Snowflake offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innodata pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Snowflake pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Innodata quarterly revenues are $58.3M, which are smaller than Snowflake quarterly revenues of $1B. Innodata's net income of $7.8M is higher than Snowflake's net income of -$430.1M. Notably, Innodata's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.26x while Snowflake's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innodata is 7.11x versus 18.11x for Snowflake. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NCR Voyix has a net margin of 13.35% compared to Innodata's net margin of -2.76%. Innodata's return on equity of 73.59% beat NCR Voyix's return on equity of 183.3%.

Innodata has a consensus price target of $64.40, signalling upside risk potential of 43.21%. On the other hand NCR Voyix has an analysts' consensus of $14.29 which suggests that it could grow by 32.03%. Given that Innodata has higher upside potential than NCR Voyix, analysts believe Innodata is more attractive than NCR Voyix.

Innodata has a beta of 2.650, which suggesting that the stock is 164.976% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NCR Voyix has a beta of 1.660, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.982%.

Innodata has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NCR Voyix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innodata pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NCR Voyix pays out 1.57% of its earnings as a dividend. NCR Voyix's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Innodata quarterly revenues are $58.3M, which are smaller than NCR Voyix quarterly revenues of $617M. Innodata's net income of $7.8M is higher than NCR Voyix's net income of -$17M. Notably, Innodata's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.26x while NCR Voyix's PE ratio is 1.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innodata is 7.11x versus 0.54x for NCR Voyix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.