APPN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Microsoft has a net margin of -0.71% compared to Appian's net margin of 36.86%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Appian has a consensus price target of $34.83, signalling upside risk potential of 18.24%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $514.34 which suggests that it could grow by 8.29%. Given that Appian has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Appian is more attractive than Microsoft.

Appian has a beta of 1.755, which suggesting that the stock is 75.484% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.397%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Appian quarterly revenues are $166.4M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Appian's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 36.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 3.40x versus 13.14x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Okta has a net margin of -0.71% compared to Appian's net margin of 9.01%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat Okta's return on equity of 2.08%.

Appian has a consensus price target of $34.83, signalling upside risk potential of 18.24%. On the other hand Okta has an analysts' consensus of $123.32 which suggests that it could grow by 26.51%. Given that Okta has higher upside potential than Appian, analysts believe Okta is more attractive than Appian.

Appian has a beta of 1.755, which suggesting that the stock is 75.484% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Okta has a beta of 0.841, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.946%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Okta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Okta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Appian quarterly revenues are $166.4M, which are smaller than Okta quarterly revenues of $688M. Appian's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Okta's net income of $62M. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Okta's PE ratio is 154.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 3.40x versus 6.53x for Okta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pegasystems has a net margin of -0.71% compared to Appian's net margin of 17.96%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat Pegasystems's return on equity of 39.42%.

Appian has a consensus price target of $34.83, signalling upside risk potential of 18.24%. On the other hand Pegasystems has an analysts' consensus of $106.12 which suggests that it could grow by 7.36%. Given that Appian has higher upside potential than Pegasystems, analysts believe Appian is more attractive than Pegasystems.

Appian has a beta of 1.755, which suggesting that the stock is 75.484% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pegasystems has a beta of 1.115, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.452%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pegasystems offers a yield of 0.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems pays out 10.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Appian quarterly revenues are $166.4M, which are smaller than Pegasystems quarterly revenues of $475.6M. Appian's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Pegasystems's net income of $85.4M. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pegasystems's PE ratio is 47.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 3.40x versus 5.60x for Pegasystems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rapid7 has a net margin of -0.71% compared to Appian's net margin of 1%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat Rapid7's return on equity of --.

Appian has a consensus price target of $34.83, signalling upside risk potential of 18.24%. On the other hand Rapid7 has an analysts' consensus of $32.71 which suggests that it could grow by 39.09%. Given that Rapid7 has higher upside potential than Appian, analysts believe Rapid7 is more attractive than Appian.

Appian has a beta of 1.755, which suggesting that the stock is 75.484% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rapid7 has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.746%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rapid7 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rapid7 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Appian quarterly revenues are $166.4M, which are smaller than Rapid7 quarterly revenues of $210.3M. Appian's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Rapid7's net income of $2.1M. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rapid7's PE ratio is 60.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 3.40x versus 1.91x for Rapid7. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.