JAMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Datadog has a net margin of 0.32% compared to Jamf Holding's net margin of 3.24%. Jamf Holding's return on equity of -6.6% beat Datadog's return on equity of 6.44%.

Jamf Holding has a consensus price target of $17.91, signalling upside risk potential of 94.24%. On the other hand Datadog has an analysts' consensus of $138.90 which suggests that it could grow by 6.17%. Given that Jamf Holding has higher upside potential than Datadog, analysts believe Jamf Holding is more attractive than Datadog.

Jamf Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Datadog has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.123%.

Jamf Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Datadog offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jamf Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Datadog pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jamf Holding quarterly revenues are $167.6M, which are smaller than Datadog quarterly revenues of $761.6M. Jamf Holding's net income of $529K is lower than Datadog's net income of $24.6M. Notably, Jamf Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Datadog's PE ratio is 284.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jamf Holding is 1.85x versus 16.62x for Datadog. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 0.32% compared to Jamf Holding's net margin of 36.86%. Jamf Holding's return on equity of -6.6% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Jamf Holding has a consensus price target of $17.91, signalling upside risk potential of 94.24%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $516.74 which suggests that it could grow by 5.35%. Given that Jamf Holding has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Jamf Holding is more attractive than Microsoft.

Jamf Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.397%.

Jamf Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Jamf Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jamf Holding quarterly revenues are $167.6M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Jamf Holding's net income of $529K is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Jamf Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 37.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jamf Holding is 1.85x versus 13.56x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qualys has a net margin of 0.32% compared to Jamf Holding's net margin of 29.73%. Jamf Holding's return on equity of -6.6% beat Qualys's return on equity of 40.21%.

Jamf Holding has a consensus price target of $17.91, signalling upside risk potential of 94.24%. On the other hand Qualys has an analysts' consensus of $136.11 which suggests that it could fall by -2.78%. Given that Jamf Holding has higher upside potential than Qualys, analysts believe Jamf Holding is more attractive than Qualys.

Jamf Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qualys has a beta of 0.613, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.671%.

Jamf Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Qualys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jamf Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Qualys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jamf Holding quarterly revenues are $167.6M, which are larger than Qualys quarterly revenues of $159.9M. Jamf Holding's net income of $529K is lower than Qualys's net income of $47.5M. Notably, Jamf Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Qualys's PE ratio is 28.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jamf Holding is 1.85x versus 8.36x for Qualys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of 0.32% compared to Jamf Holding's net margin of 3.04%. Jamf Holding's return on equity of -6.6% beat Workday's return on equity of 5.65%.

Jamf Holding has a consensus price target of $17.91, signalling upside risk potential of 94.24%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $297.62 which suggests that it could grow by 24.95%. Given that Jamf Holding has higher upside potential than Workday, analysts believe Jamf Holding is more attractive than Workday.

Jamf Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.596%.

Jamf Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jamf Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jamf Holding quarterly revenues are $167.6M, which are smaller than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Jamf Holding's net income of $529K is lower than Workday's net income of $68M. Notably, Jamf Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workday's PE ratio is 131.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jamf Holding is 1.85x versus 7.37x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.