NCNO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk has a net margin of 3.86% compared to Ncino's net margin of 9.31%. Ncino's return on equity of -2.71% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 40.52%.

Ncino has a consensus price target of $30.36, signalling upside risk potential of 12.48%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $336.87 which suggests that it could grow by 15.3%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than Ncino, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than Ncino.

Ncino has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.450, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.009%.

Ncino has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ncino pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ncino quarterly revenues are $144.1M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Ncino's net income of $5.6M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $152M. Notably, Ncino's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Autodesk's PE ratio is 62.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ncino is 5.61x versus 9.98x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Agilysys has a net margin of 3.86% compared to Ncino's net margin of 5.29%. Ncino's return on equity of -2.71% beat Agilysys's return on equity of 9.12%.

Ncino has a consensus price target of $30.36, signalling upside risk potential of 12.48%. On the other hand Agilysys has an analysts' consensus of $118.40 which suggests that it could grow by 8.33%. Given that Ncino has higher upside potential than Agilysys, analysts believe Ncino is more attractive than Agilysys.

Ncino has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agilysys has a beta of 0.737, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.267%.

Ncino has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agilysys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ncino pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ncino quarterly revenues are $144.1M, which are larger than Agilysys quarterly revenues of $74.3M. Ncino's net income of $5.6M is higher than Agilysys's net income of $3.9M. Notably, Ncino's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Agilysys's PE ratio is 131.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ncino is 5.61x versus 11.20x for Agilysys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 3.86% compared to Ncino's net margin of 36.86%. Ncino's return on equity of -2.71% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Ncino has a consensus price target of $30.36, signalling upside risk potential of 12.48%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $513.34 which suggests that it could grow by 8.08%. Given that Ncino has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Ncino is more attractive than Microsoft.

Ncino has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.397%.

Ncino has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Ncino pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ncino quarterly revenues are $144.1M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Ncino's net income of $5.6M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Ncino's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 36.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ncino is 5.61x versus 13.14x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Q2 Holdings has a net margin of 3.86% compared to Ncino's net margin of 2.51%. Ncino's return on equity of -2.71% beat Q2 Holdings's return on equity of -3.98%.

Ncino has a consensus price target of $30.36, signalling upside risk potential of 12.48%. On the other hand Q2 Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $99.06 which suggests that it could grow by 15.62%. Given that Q2 Holdings has higher upside potential than Ncino, analysts believe Q2 Holdings is more attractive than Ncino.

Ncino has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Q2 Holdings has a beta of 1.484, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.433%.

Ncino has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Q2 Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ncino pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Q2 Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ncino quarterly revenues are $144.1M, which are smaller than Q2 Holdings quarterly revenues of $189.7M. Ncino's net income of $5.6M is higher than Q2 Holdings's net income of $4.8M. Notably, Ncino's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Q2 Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ncino is 5.61x versus 7.31x for Q2 Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.