QTWO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ansys has a net margin of -6.74% compared to Q2 Holdings's net margin of 21.3%. Q2 Holdings's return on equity of -12.18% beat Ansys's return on equity of 10.43%.

Q2 Holdings has a consensus price target of $102.00, signalling downside risk potential of -1.64%. On the other hand Ansys has an analysts' consensus of $348.25 which suggests that it could grow by 3.94%. Given that Ansys has higher upside potential than Q2 Holdings, analysts believe Ansys is more attractive than Q2 Holdings.

Q2 Holdings has a beta of 1.605, which suggesting that the stock is 60.512% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ansys has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.468%.

Q2 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ansys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q2 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ansys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Q2 Holdings quarterly revenues are $175M, which are smaller than Ansys quarterly revenues of $601.9M. Q2 Holdings's net income of -$11.8M is lower than Ansys's net income of $128.2M. Notably, Q2 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ansys's PE ratio is 52.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q2 Holdings is 9.16x versus 12.07x for Ansys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Datadog has a net margin of -6.74% compared to Q2 Holdings's net margin of 7.49%. Q2 Holdings's return on equity of -12.18% beat Datadog's return on equity of 8.68%.

Q2 Holdings has a consensus price target of $102.00, signalling downside risk potential of -1.64%. On the other hand Datadog has an analysts' consensus of $159.27 which suggests that it could grow by 8.01%. Given that Datadog has higher upside potential than Q2 Holdings, analysts believe Datadog is more attractive than Q2 Holdings.

Q2 Holdings has a beta of 1.605, which suggesting that the stock is 60.512% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Datadog has a beta of 1.114, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.381%.

Q2 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Datadog offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q2 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Datadog pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Q2 Holdings quarterly revenues are $175M, which are smaller than Datadog quarterly revenues of $690M. Q2 Holdings's net income of -$11.8M is lower than Datadog's net income of $51.7M. Notably, Q2 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Datadog's PE ratio is 278.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q2 Holdings is 9.16x versus 21.87x for Datadog. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DocuSign has a net margin of -6.74% compared to Q2 Holdings's net margin of 8.27%. Q2 Holdings's return on equity of -12.18% beat DocuSign's return on equity of 70.42%.

Q2 Holdings has a consensus price target of $102.00, signalling downside risk potential of -1.64%. On the other hand DocuSign has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 0.13%. Given that DocuSign has higher upside potential than Q2 Holdings, analysts believe DocuSign is more attractive than Q2 Holdings.

Q2 Holdings has a beta of 1.605, which suggesting that the stock is 60.512% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DocuSign has a beta of 0.920, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.009%.

Q2 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DocuSign offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q2 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DocuSign pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Q2 Holdings quarterly revenues are $175M, which are smaller than DocuSign quarterly revenues of $754.8M. Q2 Holdings's net income of -$11.8M is lower than DocuSign's net income of $62.4M. Notably, Q2 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DocuSign's PE ratio is 19.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q2 Holdings is 9.16x versus 6.89x for DocuSign. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PTC has a net margin of -6.74% compared to Q2 Holdings's net margin of 20.19%. Q2 Holdings's return on equity of -12.18% beat PTC's return on equity of 12.84%.

Q2 Holdings has a consensus price target of $102.00, signalling downside risk potential of -1.64%. On the other hand PTC has an analysts' consensus of $211.67 which suggests that it could grow by 14.26%. Given that PTC has higher upside potential than Q2 Holdings, analysts believe PTC is more attractive than Q2 Holdings.

Q2 Holdings has a beta of 1.605, which suggesting that the stock is 60.512% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PTC has a beta of 1.161, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.064%.

Q2 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PTC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q2 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PTC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Q2 Holdings quarterly revenues are $175M, which are smaller than PTC quarterly revenues of $626.5M. Q2 Holdings's net income of -$11.8M is lower than PTC's net income of $126.5M. Notably, Q2 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PTC's PE ratio is 59.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q2 Holdings is 9.16x versus 9.73x for PTC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.