Financhill
Buy
65

VLO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$148.83
Seasonality move :
-1.63%
Day range:
$148.50 - $151.91
52-week range:
$99.00 - $167.78
Dividend yield:
2.96%
P/E ratio:
52.60x
P/S ratio:
0.37x
P/B ratio:
1.99x
Volume:
2.6M
Avg. volume:
3.4M
1-year change:
0.64%
Market cap:
$46.6B
Revenue:
$129.9B
EPS (TTM):
$2.83

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
VLO
Valero Energy
$27B $1.77 -21.71% -32.6% $149.82
BKR
Baker Hughes
$6.6B $0.55 -1.92% -20.66% $46.56
COP
ConocoPhillips
$14.7B $1.40 5.62% -25.21% $116.62
MPC
Marathon Petroleum
$31.8B $3.14 -15.26% -23.35% $175.05
PSX
Phillips 66
$31.9B $1.66 -10.47% 169.28% $132.82
XOM
Exxon Mobil
$80.4B $1.55 -12.13% -30.26% $124.49
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
VLO
Valero Energy
$148.87 $149.82 $46.6B 52.60x $1.13 2.96% 0.37x
BKR
Baker Hughes
$39.87 $46.56 $39.5B 13.61x $0.23 2.21% 1.43x
COP
ConocoPhillips
$94.17 $116.62 $118.9B 11.97x $0.78 3.31% 1.98x
MPC
Marathon Petroleum
$175.63 $175.05 $54B 24.70x $0.91 2.02% 0.42x
PSX
Phillips 66
$129.01 $132.82 $52.6B 29.39x $1.20 3.6% 0.39x
XOM
Exxon Mobil
$113.92 $124.49 $491B 15.11x $0.99 3.44% 1.47x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
VLO
Valero Energy
31.6% 1.294 24.56% 1.05x
BKR
Baker Hughes
26.12% 1.367 13.79% 0.79x
COP
ConocoPhillips
26.72% 0.033 17.94% 1.02x
MPC
Marathon Petroleum
65.34% 1.575 59.8% 0.70x
PSX
Phillips 66
40.81% 1.576 36.58% 0.79x
XOM
Exxon Mobil
12.51% 0.074 7.23% 0.86x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
VLO
Valero Energy
$496M $231M 2.41% 3.35% -2.58% $703M
BKR
Baker Hughes
$1.5B $752M 13.08% 17.87% 9.52% $409M
COP
ConocoPhillips
$5.1B $4.2B 12.52% 17.1% 28.85% $2.7B
MPC
Marathon Petroleum
$1.4B $354M 4.44% 9.28% 2.28% -$727M
PSX
Phillips 66
$2B -$395M 3.76% 6.28% 2.9% -$236M
XOM
Exxon Mobil
$18.5B $9.8B 11% 12.7% 14.56% $7.1B

Valero Energy vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns VLO or BKR?

    Baker Hughes has a net margin of -1.97% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of 6.26%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35% beat Baker Hughes's return on equity of 17.87%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    1.64% -$1.90 $37.2B
    BKR
    Baker Hughes
    22.95% $0.40 $23.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About VLO or BKR?

    Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $149.82, signalling upside risk potential of 0.45%. On the other hand Baker Hughes has an analysts' consensus of $46.56 which suggests that it could grow by 16.77%. Given that Baker Hughes has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe Baker Hughes is more attractive than Valero Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    10 6 0
    BKR
    Baker Hughes
    14 6 0
  • Is VLO or BKR More Risky?

    Valero Energy has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.281% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.724%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock VLO or BKR?

    Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.96%. Baker Hughes offers a yield of 2.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Baker Hughes pays out 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios VLO or BKR?

    Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.3B, which are larger than Baker Hughes quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Valero Energy's net income of -$595M is lower than Baker Hughes's net income of $402M. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.60x while Baker Hughes's PE ratio is 13.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.37x versus 1.43x for Baker Hughes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    0.37x 52.60x $30.3B -$595M
    BKR
    Baker Hughes
    1.43x 13.61x $6.4B $402M
  • Which has Higher Returns VLO or COP?

    ConocoPhillips has a net margin of -1.97% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of 17.25%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35% beat ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.1%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    1.64% -$1.90 $37.2B
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    30.74% $2.23 $89B
  • What do Analysts Say About VLO or COP?

    Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $149.82, signalling upside risk potential of 0.45%. On the other hand ConocoPhillips has an analysts' consensus of $116.62 which suggests that it could grow by 23.85%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Valero Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    10 6 0
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    15 3 0
  • Is VLO or COP More Risky?

    Valero Energy has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.281% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.616, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.357%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock VLO or COP?

    Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.96%. ConocoPhillips offers a yield of 3.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. ConocoPhillips pays out 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios VLO or COP?

    Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.3B, which are larger than ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues of $16.5B. Valero Energy's net income of -$595M is lower than ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.60x while ConocoPhillips's PE ratio is 11.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.37x versus 1.98x for ConocoPhillips. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    0.37x 52.60x $30.3B -$595M
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    1.98x 11.97x $16.5B $2.8B
  • Which has Higher Returns VLO or MPC?

    Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of -1.97% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of -0.24%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 9.28%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    1.64% -$1.90 $37.2B
    MPC
    Marathon Petroleum
    4.33% -$0.24 $54B
  • What do Analysts Say About VLO or MPC?

    Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $149.82, signalling upside risk potential of 0.45%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $175.05 which suggests that it could fall by -0.33%. Given that Valero Energy has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe Valero Energy is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    10 6 0
    MPC
    Marathon Petroleum
    8 9 0
  • Is VLO or MPC More Risky?

    Valero Energy has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.281% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.882, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.787%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock VLO or MPC?

    Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.96%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios VLO or MPC?

    Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.3B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $31.5B. Valero Energy's net income of -$595M is lower than Marathon Petroleum's net income of -$74M. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.60x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 24.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.37x versus 0.42x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    0.37x 52.60x $30.3B -$595M
    MPC
    Marathon Petroleum
    0.42x 24.70x $31.5B -$74M
  • Which has Higher Returns VLO or PSX?

    Phillips 66 has a net margin of -1.97% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of 1.6%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    1.64% -$1.90 $37.2B
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    6.5% $1.18 $47.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About VLO or PSX?

    Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $149.82, signalling upside risk potential of 0.45%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $132.82 which suggests that it could grow by 2.96%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Valero Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    10 6 0
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    10 9 0
  • Is VLO or PSX More Risky?

    Valero Energy has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.281% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.021, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.127%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock VLO or PSX?

    Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.96%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios VLO or PSX?

    Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.3B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $30.4B. Valero Energy's net income of -$595M is lower than Phillips 66's net income of $487M. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.60x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 29.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.37x versus 0.39x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    0.37x 52.60x $30.3B -$595M
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    0.39x 29.39x $30.4B $487M
  • Which has Higher Returns VLO or XOM?

    Exxon Mobil has a net margin of -1.97% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of 9.52%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 12.7%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    1.64% -$1.90 $37.2B
    XOM
    Exxon Mobil
    22.81% $1.76 $307.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About VLO or XOM?

    Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $149.82, signalling upside risk potential of 0.45%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $124.49 which suggests that it could grow by 9.25%. Given that Exxon Mobil has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe Exxon Mobil is more attractive than Valero Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    10 6 0
    XOM
    Exxon Mobil
    10 10 0
  • Is VLO or XOM More Risky?

    Valero Energy has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.281% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.499, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.08%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock VLO or XOM?

    Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.96%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios VLO or XOM?

    Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.3B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Valero Energy's net income of -$595M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.7B. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.60x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 15.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.37x versus 1.47x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    0.37x 52.60x $30.3B -$595M
    XOM
    Exxon Mobil
    1.47x 15.11x $81.1B $7.7B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

How High Can SharkNinja Stock Go?
How High Can SharkNinja Stock Go?

If you know popular consumer appliance brands Shark and Ninja,…

Will Oklo Stock Double?
Will Oklo Stock Double?

Oklo (NYSE: OKLO) is only a year removed from its SPAC‑enabled debut,…

Why a $5 Stock Is Suddenly a Cash Machine
Why a $5 Stock Is Suddenly a Cash Machine

If you stopped tracking Grab Holdings (NASDAQ: GRAB) after its 2021 SPAC…

Stock Ideas

Buy
69
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 56x

Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x

Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 34x

Alerts

Buy
77
VBTX alert for Jul 15

Veritex Holdings [VBTX] is down 3.26% over the past day.

Buy
72
MNPR alert for Jul 15

Monopar Therapeutics [MNPR] is down 8.6% over the past day.

Buy
56
NBIS alert for Jul 15

Nebius Group NV [NBIS] is up 2.98% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock