MPC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chevron has a net margin of -0.24% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 7.59%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 9.28% beat Chevron's return on equity of 10.01%.

Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $166.25, signalling upside risk potential of 0.94%. On the other hand Chevron has an analysts' consensus of $163.49 which suggests that it could grow by 12.92%. Given that Chevron has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe Chevron is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.893, which suggesting that the stock is 10.743% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron has a beta of 0.827, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.303%.

Marathon Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. Chevron offers a yield of 4.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Marathon Petroleum pays 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron pays out 66.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues are $31.5B, which are smaller than Chevron quarterly revenues of $46.1B. Marathon Petroleum's net income of -$74M is lower than Chevron's net income of $3.5B. Notably, Marathon Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.16x while Chevron's PE ratio is 16.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marathon Petroleum is 0.39x versus 1.35x for Chevron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of -0.24% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 1.6%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 9.28% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28%.

Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $166.25, signalling upside risk potential of 0.94%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $131.02 which suggests that it could grow by 8.41%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.893, which suggesting that the stock is 10.743% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.711%.

Marathon Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Marathon Petroleum pays 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues are $31.5B, which are larger than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $30.4B. Marathon Petroleum's net income of -$74M is lower than Phillips 66's net income of $487M. Notably, Marathon Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.16x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 27.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marathon Petroleum is 0.39x versus 0.37x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy has a net margin of -0.24% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of -1.97%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 9.28% beat Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35%.

Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $166.25, signalling upside risk potential of 0.94%. On the other hand Valero Energy has an analysts' consensus of $144.42 which suggests that it could grow by 7.73%. Given that Valero Energy has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe Valero Energy is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.893, which suggesting that the stock is 10.743% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy has a beta of 0.995, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.482%.

Marathon Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. Valero Energy offers a yield of 3.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. Marathon Petroleum pays 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy pays out 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues are $31.5B, which are larger than Valero Energy quarterly revenues of $30.3B. Marathon Petroleum's net income of -$74M is higher than Valero Energy's net income of -$595M. Notably, Marathon Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.16x while Valero Energy's PE ratio is 47.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marathon Petroleum is 0.39x versus 0.33x for Valero Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of -0.24% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 9.52%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 9.28% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 12.7%.

Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $166.25, signalling upside risk potential of 0.94%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $123.65 which suggests that it could grow by 13.11%. Given that Exxon Mobil has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe Exxon Mobil is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.893, which suggesting that the stock is 10.743% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.493, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.672%.

Marathon Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Marathon Petroleum pays 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues are $31.5B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Marathon Petroleum's net income of -$74M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.7B. Notably, Marathon Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.16x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 14.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marathon Petroleum is 0.39x versus 1.41x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.