COP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EOG Resources has a net margin of 15.79% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 28.53%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 20.22% beat EOG Resources's return on equity of 24.93%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $132.86, signalling upside risk potential of 36.82%. On the other hand EOG Resources has an analysts' consensus of $145.21 which suggests that it could grow by 20.18%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than EOG Resources, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than EOG Resources.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.904% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EOG Resources has a beta of 1.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.345%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.21%. EOG Resources offers a yield of 3.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 50.95% of its earnings as a dividend. EOG Resources pays out 44.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $13B, which are larger than EOG Resources quarterly revenues of $5.9B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.1B is higher than EOG Resources's net income of $1.7B. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.55x while EOG Resources's PE ratio is 9.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 2.07x versus 2.93x for EOG Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 15.79% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 24.92%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 20.22% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 14.68%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $132.86, signalling upside risk potential of 36.82%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $215.17 which suggests that it could grow by 36.38%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.904% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.885, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.497%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.21%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 5.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 50.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 45.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $13B, which are larger than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $2.6B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.1B is higher than Diamondback Energy's net income of $659M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.55x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 9.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 2.07x versus 3.05x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 15.79% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 28.87%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 20.22% beat Matador Resources's return on equity of 20.48%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $132.86, signalling upside risk potential of 36.82%. On the other hand Matador Resources has an analysts' consensus of $76.36 which suggests that it could grow by 37.74%. Given that Matador Resources has higher upside potential than ConocoPhillips, analysts believe Matador Resources is more attractive than ConocoPhillips.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.904% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matador Resources has a beta of 3.262, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 226.245%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.21%. Matador Resources offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 50.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 9.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $13B, which are larger than Matador Resources quarterly revenues of $860.1M. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.1B is higher than Matador Resources's net income of $248.3M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.55x while Matador Resources's PE ratio is 7.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 2.07x versus 1.99x for Matador Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 15.79% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 9.81%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 20.22% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 14.21%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $132.86, signalling upside risk potential of 36.82%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $130.14 which suggests that it could grow by 22.31%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.904% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.004%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.21%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 50.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 41.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $13B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $87.8B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.1B is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $8.6B. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.55x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 2.07x versus 1.31x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.