COP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EOG Resources has a net margin of 17.25% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 25.04%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.1% beat EOG Resources's return on equity of 20.78%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $116.62, signalling upside risk potential of 23.85%. On the other hand EOG Resources has an analysts' consensus of $141.17 which suggests that it could grow by 15.14%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than EOG Resources, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than EOG Resources.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.616, which suggesting that the stock is 38.357% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EOG Resources has a beta of 0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.747%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. EOG Resources offers a yield of 3.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. EOG Resources pays out 32.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $16.5B, which are larger than EOG Resources quarterly revenues of $5.8B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.8B is higher than EOG Resources's net income of $1.5B. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.97x while EOG Resources's PE ratio is 11.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.98x versus 2.95x for EOG Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 17.25% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 34.86%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.1% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $116.62, signalling upside risk potential of 23.85%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $182.00 which suggests that it could grow by 28.21%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than ConocoPhillips, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than ConocoPhillips.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.616, which suggesting that the stock is 38.357% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.052%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $16.5B, which are larger than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.8B is higher than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.97x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.98x versus 2.67x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 17.25% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 13.76%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.1% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 9.25%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $116.62, signalling upside risk potential of 23.85%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $50.54 which suggests that it could grow by 12.14%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Occidental Petroleum, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Occidental Petroleum.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.616, which suggesting that the stock is 38.357% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 0.842, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.79%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 2.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 47.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $16.5B, which are larger than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $6.8B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.8B is higher than Occidental Petroleum's net income of $936M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.97x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 18.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.98x versus 1.60x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of 17.25% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 1.6%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.1% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $116.62, signalling upside risk potential of 23.85%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $132.82 which suggests that it could grow by 2.96%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Phillips 66.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.616, which suggesting that the stock is 38.357% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.021, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.127%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $16.5B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $30.4B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.8B is higher than Phillips 66's net income of $487M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.97x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 29.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.98x versus 0.39x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.