COP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Delek US Holdings has a net margin of 16.2% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of -6.54%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.57% beat Delek US Holdings's return on equity of -88.27%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $117.61, signalling upside risk potential of 32.42%. On the other hand Delek US Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.56 which suggests that it could grow by 1.88%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Delek US Holdings, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Delek US Holdings.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Delek US Holdings has a beta of 0.744, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.581%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. Delek US Holdings offers a yield of 6.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Delek US Holdings pays out -11.46% of its earnings as a dividend. ConocoPhillips's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are larger than Delek US Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.6B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.3B is higher than Delek US Holdings's net income of -$172.7M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.40x while Delek US Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.92x versus 0.08x for Delek US Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 16.2% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of -0.24%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.57% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 9.28%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $117.61, signalling upside risk potential of 32.42%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $158.65 which suggests that it could grow by 5.79%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.254%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $31.5B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.3B is higher than Marathon Petroleum's net income of -$74M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.40x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 21.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.92x versus 0.36x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of 16.2% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 1.6%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.57% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $117.61, signalling upside risk potential of 32.42%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $128.91 which suggests that it could grow by 18.06%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Phillips 66.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.212%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 4.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $30.4B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.3B is higher than Phillips 66's net income of $487M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.40x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 24.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.92x versus 0.33x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy has a net margin of 16.2% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of -1.97%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.57% beat Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $117.61, signalling upside risk potential of 32.42%. On the other hand Valero Energy has an analysts' consensus of $141.62 which suggests that it could grow by 16.34%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Valero Energy.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy has a beta of 0.980, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.044%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. Valero Energy offers a yield of 3.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy pays out 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are smaller than Valero Energy quarterly revenues of $30.3B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.3B is higher than Valero Energy's net income of -$595M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.40x while Valero Energy's PE ratio is 43.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.92x versus 0.30x for Valero Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.