BKR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Halliburton has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Baker Hughes's net margin of 3.77%. Baker Hughes's return on equity of 17.87% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 20.56%.

Baker Hughes has a consensus price target of $46.63, signalling upside risk potential of 25.26%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $29.12 which suggests that it could grow by 45.8%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Baker Hughes.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.121% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.186, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.638%.

Baker Hughes has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Halliburton offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Baker Hughes pays 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are larger than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.4B. Baker Hughes's net income of $402M is higher than Halliburton's net income of $204M. Notably, Baker Hughes's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.71x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 8.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes is 1.34x versus 0.78x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Baker Hughes's net margin of 16.91%. Baker Hughes's return on equity of 17.87% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.13%.

Baker Hughes has a consensus price target of $46.63, signalling upside risk potential of 25.26%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $30.14 which suggests that it could grow by 6.91%. Given that Baker Hughes has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe Baker Hughes is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.121% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.743, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.741%.

Baker Hughes has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Baker Hughes pays 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are larger than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Baker Hughes's net income of $402M is lower than Kinder Morgan's net income of $717M. Notably, Baker Hughes's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.71x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 24.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes is 1.34x versus 4.04x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextDecade has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Baker Hughes's net margin of --. Baker Hughes's return on equity of 17.87% beat NextDecade's return on equity of --.

Baker Hughes has a consensus price target of $46.63, signalling upside risk potential of 25.26%. On the other hand NextDecade has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 25.33%. Given that NextDecade has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes, analysts believe NextDecade is more attractive than Baker Hughes.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.121% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextDecade has a beta of 1.053, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.287%.

Baker Hughes has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. NextDecade offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baker Hughes pays 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. NextDecade pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baker Hughes's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are larger than NextDecade quarterly revenues of --. Baker Hughes's net income of $402M is higher than NextDecade's net income of -$88.8M. Notably, Baker Hughes's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.71x while NextDecade's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes is 1.34x versus -- for NextDecade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schlumberger has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Baker Hughes's net margin of 9.39%. Baker Hughes's return on equity of 17.87% beat Schlumberger's return on equity of 19.04%.

Baker Hughes has a consensus price target of $46.63, signalling upside risk potential of 25.26%. On the other hand Schlumberger has an analysts' consensus of $47.50 which suggests that it could grow by 39.99%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Baker Hughes.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.121% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schlumberger has a beta of 1.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.627%.

Baker Hughes has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Schlumberger offers a yield of 3.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Baker Hughes pays 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger pays out 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are smaller than Schlumberger quarterly revenues of $8.5B. Baker Hughes's net income of $402M is lower than Schlumberger's net income of $797M. Notably, Baker Hughes's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.71x while Schlumberger's PE ratio is 11.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes is 1.34x versus 1.33x for Schlumberger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.