TAP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 5.25% compared to Molson Coors Beverage's net margin of 29.92%. Molson Coors Beverage's return on equity of 7.7% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18%.

Molson Coors Beverage has a consensus price target of $60.32, signalling upside risk potential of 21.94%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $77.79 which suggests that it could grow by 11.97%. Given that Molson Coors Beverage has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Molson Coors Beverage is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Molson Coors Beverage has a beta of 0.686, which suggesting that the stock is 31.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.452, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.785%.

Molson Coors Beverage has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.68%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Molson Coors Beverage pays 32.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Molson Coors Beverage quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.1B. Molson Coors Beverage's net income of $121M is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Molson Coors Beverage's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.95x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 27.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Molson Coors Beverage is 0.91x versus 6.40x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Boston Beer has a net margin of 5.25% compared to Molson Coors Beverage's net margin of 5.38%. Molson Coors Beverage's return on equity of 7.7% beat Boston Beer's return on equity of 7.28%.

Molson Coors Beverage has a consensus price target of $60.32, signalling upside risk potential of 21.94%. On the other hand Boston Beer has an analysts' consensus of $254.67 which suggests that it could grow by 32.64%. Given that Boston Beer has higher upside potential than Molson Coors Beverage, analysts believe Boston Beer is more attractive than Molson Coors Beverage.

Molson Coors Beverage has a beta of 0.686, which suggesting that the stock is 31.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boston Beer has a beta of 0.991, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.94%.

Molson Coors Beverage has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.68%. Boston Beer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Molson Coors Beverage pays 32.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Boston Beer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Molson Coors Beverage's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Molson Coors Beverage quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Boston Beer quarterly revenues of $453.9M. Molson Coors Beverage's net income of $121M is higher than Boston Beer's net income of $24.4M. Notably, Molson Coors Beverage's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.95x while Boston Beer's PE ratio is 31.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Molson Coors Beverage is 0.91x versus 1.09x for Boston Beer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Constellation Brands has a net margin of 5.25% compared to Molson Coors Beverage's net margin of 20.52%. Molson Coors Beverage's return on equity of 7.7% beat Constellation Brands's return on equity of -5.33%.

Molson Coors Beverage has a consensus price target of $60.32, signalling upside risk potential of 21.94%. On the other hand Constellation Brands has an analysts' consensus of $210.01 which suggests that it could grow by 27.61%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than Molson Coors Beverage, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than Molson Coors Beverage.

Molson Coors Beverage has a beta of 0.686, which suggesting that the stock is 31.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.670, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.025%.

Molson Coors Beverage has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.68%. Constellation Brands offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share. Molson Coors Beverage pays 32.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Brands pays out -899.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Molson Coors Beverage's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Molson Coors Beverage quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Constellation Brands quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Molson Coors Beverage's net income of $121M is lower than Constellation Brands's net income of $516.1M. Notably, Molson Coors Beverage's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.95x while Constellation Brands's PE ratio is 49.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Molson Coors Beverage is 0.91x versus 2.95x for Constellation Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zevia PBC has a net margin of 5.25% compared to Molson Coors Beverage's net margin of -13.74%. Molson Coors Beverage's return on equity of 7.7% beat Zevia PBC's return on equity of -41.2%.

Molson Coors Beverage has a consensus price target of $60.32, signalling upside risk potential of 21.94%. On the other hand Zevia PBC has an analysts' consensus of $4.13 which suggests that it could grow by 38.89%. Given that Zevia PBC has higher upside potential than Molson Coors Beverage, analysts believe Zevia PBC is more attractive than Molson Coors Beverage.

Molson Coors Beverage has a beta of 0.686, which suggesting that the stock is 31.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zevia PBC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Molson Coors Beverage has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.68%. Zevia PBC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Molson Coors Beverage pays 32.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Zevia PBC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Molson Coors Beverage's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Molson Coors Beverage quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Zevia PBC quarterly revenues of $38M. Molson Coors Beverage's net income of $121M is higher than Zevia PBC's net income of -$5.2M. Notably, Molson Coors Beverage's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.95x while Zevia PBC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Molson Coors Beverage is 0.91x versus 1.23x for Zevia PBC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.