LRCX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Applied Materials has a net margin of 28.19% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 16.54%. Lam Research's return on equity of 53.73% beat Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $89.77, signalling upside risk potential of 19.85%. On the other hand Applied Materials has an analysts' consensus of $201.7746 which suggests that it could grow by 29.34%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than Lam Research, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than Lam Research.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.645, which suggesting that the stock is 64.523% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Applied Materials has a beta of 1.712, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.198%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. Applied Materials offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than Applied Materials quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Lam Research's net income of $1.3B is higher than Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.88x while Applied Materials's PE ratio is 20.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 5.68x versus 4.68x for Applied Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 28.19% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 9.53%. Lam Research's return on equity of 53.73% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 3.91%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $89.77, signalling upside risk potential of 19.85%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $126.98 which suggests that it could grow by 24.86%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has higher upside potential than Lam Research, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than Lam Research.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.645, which suggesting that the stock is 64.523% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.969, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.904%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Lam Research's net income of $1.3B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $709M. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.88x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 74.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 5.68x versus 5.99x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 28.19% compared to Lam Research's net margin of -6.48%. Lam Research's return on equity of 53.73% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.53%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $89.77, signalling upside risk potential of 19.85%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $21.58 which suggests that it could grow by 2.75%. Given that Lam Research has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Lam Research is more attractive than Intel.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.645, which suggesting that the stock is 64.523% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.441%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. Intel offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Lam Research's net income of $1.3B is higher than Intel's net income of -$821M. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.88x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 5.68x versus 1.70x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 28.19% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 35.53%. Lam Research's return on equity of 53.73% beat KLA's return on equity of 104.91%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $89.77, signalling upside risk potential of 19.85%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $785.09 which suggests that it could grow by 11.63%. Given that Lam Research has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Lam Research is more attractive than KLA.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.645, which suggesting that the stock is 64.523% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.405, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.453%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. KLA offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Lam Research's net income of $1.3B is higher than KLA's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.88x while KLA's PE ratio is 25.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 5.68x versus 8.18x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.