LRCX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 28.19% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 9.53%. Lam Research's return on equity of 53.73% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 3.91%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $95.44, signalling downside risk potential of -6.19%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $137.72 which suggests that it could fall by -5.94%. Given that Lam Research has more downside risk than Advanced Micro Devices, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than Lam Research.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.683, which suggesting that the stock is 68.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 2.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.692%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Lam Research's net income of $1.3B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $709M. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.35x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 107.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 7.71x versus 8.62x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 28.19% compared to Lam Research's net margin of -6.48%. Lam Research's return on equity of 53.73% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.53%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $95.44, signalling downside risk potential of -6.19%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $21.40 which suggests that it could fall by -8.65%. Given that Intel has more downside risk than Lam Research, analysts believe Lam Research is more attractive than Intel.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.683, which suggesting that the stock is 68.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.352%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. Intel offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Lam Research's net income of $1.3B is higher than Intel's net income of -$821M. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.35x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 7.71x versus 1.90x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 28.19% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 35.53%. Lam Research's return on equity of 53.73% beat KLA's return on equity of 104.91%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $95.44, signalling downside risk potential of -6.19%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $830.45 which suggests that it could fall by -10.18%. Given that KLA has more downside risk than Lam Research, analysts believe Lam Research is more attractive than KLA.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.683, which suggesting that the stock is 68.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.423, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.272%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. KLA offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Lam Research's net income of $1.3B is higher than KLA's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.35x while KLA's PE ratio is 33.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 7.71x versus 10.76x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 28.19% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 9.39%. Lam Research's return on equity of 53.73% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -3.57%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $95.44, signalling downside risk potential of -6.19%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $90.12 which suggests that it could grow by 23.95%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Lam Research, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Lam Research.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.683, which suggesting that the stock is 68.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.814, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.355%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Lam Research's net income of $1.3B is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $177.9M. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.35x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 7.71x versus 9.71x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.