AMAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intel has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of -6.48%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.53%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $201.7746, signalling upside risk potential of 29.34%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $21.58 which suggests that it could grow by 2.75%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than Intel.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.712, which suggesting that the stock is 71.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.441%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. Intel offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B is higher than Intel's net income of -$821M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.39x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.68x versus 1.70x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 35.53%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44% beat KLA's return on equity of 104.91%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $201.7746, signalling upside risk potential of 29.34%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $785.09 which suggests that it could grow by 11.63%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than KLA.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.712, which suggesting that the stock is 71.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.405, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.453%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. KLA offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B is higher than KLA's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.39x while KLA's PE ratio is 25.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.68x versus 8.18x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 11.02%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $201.7746, signalling upside risk potential of 29.34%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $103.36 which suggests that it could grow by 79.35%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Applied Materials.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.712, which suggesting that the stock is 71.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.826, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.607%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.39x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.68x versus 8.65x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 19.66%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 10.22%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $201.7746, signalling upside risk potential of 29.34%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $123.35 which suggests that it could grow by 44.86%. Given that Micron Technology has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, analysts believe Micron Technology is more attractive than Applied Materials.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.712, which suggesting that the stock is 71.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.842%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are smaller than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $8.1B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B is lower than Micron Technology's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.39x while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 20.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.68x versus 3.08x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.