AMAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intel has a net margin of 30.1% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of -6.48%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 36.09% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.53%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $198.0359, signalling upside risk potential of 0.48%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $21.52 which suggests that it could fall by -7.65%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than Intel.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.694, which suggesting that the stock is 69.389% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.352%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Intel offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Applied Materials's net income of $2.1B is higher than Intel's net income of -$821M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.98x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 5.78x versus 1.89x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 30.1% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 35.53%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 36.09% beat KLA's return on equity of 104.91%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $198.0359, signalling upside risk potential of 0.48%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $830.45 which suggests that it could fall by -9.91%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than KLA.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.694, which suggesting that the stock is 69.389% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.423, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.272%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. KLA offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Applied Materials's net income of $2.1B is higher than KLA's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.98x while KLA's PE ratio is 33.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 5.78x versus 10.73x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 30.1% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 9.39%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 36.09% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -3.57%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $198.0359, signalling upside risk potential of 0.48%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $90.27 which suggests that it could grow by 24.5%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Applied Materials.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.694, which suggesting that the stock is 69.389% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.814, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.355%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Applied Materials's net income of $2.1B is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $177.9M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.98x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 5.78x versus 9.68x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology has a net margin of 30.1% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 20.27%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 36.09% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 13.22%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $198.0359, signalling upside risk potential of 0.48%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $148.90 which suggests that it could grow by 25.54%. Given that Micron Technology has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, analysts believe Micron Technology is more attractive than Applied Materials.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.694, which suggesting that the stock is 69.389% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.347, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.693%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are smaller than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $9.3B. Applied Materials's net income of $2.1B is higher than Micron Technology's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.98x while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 21.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 5.78x versus 3.97x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.