INTC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of -6.48% compared to Intel's net margin of 9.53%. Intel's return on equity of -17.53% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 3.91%.

Intel has a consensus price target of $21.34, signalling downside risk potential of -0.36%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $126.98 which suggests that it could grow by 23.47%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than Intel.

Intel has a beta of 1.154, which suggesting that the stock is 15.441% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.969, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.904%.

Intel has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intel pays -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intel quarterly revenues are $12.7B, which are larger than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Intel's net income of -$821M is lower than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $709M. Notably, Intel's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.83x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 75.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intel is 1.74x versus 6.05x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lattice Semiconductor has a net margin of -6.48% compared to Intel's net margin of 4.18%. Intel's return on equity of -17.53% beat Lattice Semiconductor's return on equity of 7.33%.

Intel has a consensus price target of $21.34, signalling downside risk potential of -0.36%. On the other hand Lattice Semiconductor has an analysts' consensus of $62.88 which suggests that it could grow by 26.7%. Given that Lattice Semiconductor has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Lattice Semiconductor is more attractive than Intel.

Intel has a beta of 1.154, which suggesting that the stock is 15.441% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lattice Semiconductor has a beta of 1.601, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.065%.

Intel has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. Lattice Semiconductor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intel pays -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Lattice Semiconductor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intel quarterly revenues are $12.7B, which are larger than Lattice Semiconductor quarterly revenues of $120.2M. Intel's net income of -$821M is lower than Lattice Semiconductor's net income of $5M. Notably, Intel's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.83x while Lattice Semiconductor's PE ratio is 134.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intel is 1.74x versus 14.04x for Lattice Semiconductor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of -6.48% compared to Intel's net margin of 11.02%. Intel's return on equity of -17.53% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

Intel has a consensus price target of $21.34, signalling downside risk potential of -0.36%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $103.36 which suggests that it could grow by 73.28%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Intel.

Intel has a beta of 1.154, which suggesting that the stock is 15.441% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.826, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.607%.

Intel has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Intel pays -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend.

Intel quarterly revenues are $12.7B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Intel's net income of -$821M is lower than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Intel's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.83x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intel is 1.74x versus 8.95x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology has a net margin of -6.48% compared to Intel's net margin of 19.66%. Intel's return on equity of -17.53% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 10.22%.

Intel has a consensus price target of $21.34, signalling downside risk potential of -0.36%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $123.35 which suggests that it could grow by 43.66%. Given that Micron Technology has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Micron Technology is more attractive than Intel.

Intel has a beta of 1.154, which suggesting that the stock is 15.441% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.842%.

Intel has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Intel pays -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intel quarterly revenues are $12.7B, which are larger than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $8.1B. Intel's net income of -$821M is lower than Micron Technology's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Intel's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.83x while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 20.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intel is 1.74x versus 3.10x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.