IRM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Innovative Industrial Properties has a net margin of 1% compared to Iron Mountain's net margin of 43.33%. Iron Mountain's return on equity of 236.21% beat Innovative Industrial Properties's return on equity of 7.9%.

Iron Mountain has a consensus price target of $115.30, signalling upside risk potential of 12.19%. On the other hand Innovative Industrial Properties has an analysts' consensus of $65.60 which suggests that it could grow by 15.35%. Given that Innovative Industrial Properties has higher upside potential than Iron Mountain, analysts believe Innovative Industrial Properties is more attractive than Iron Mountain.

Iron Mountain has a beta of 1.090, which suggesting that the stock is 9.03% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovative Industrial Properties has a beta of 1.701, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.127%.

Iron Mountain has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. Innovative Industrial Properties offers a yield of 13.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. Iron Mountain pays 438.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Innovative Industrial Properties pays out 132.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Iron Mountain quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Innovative Industrial Properties quarterly revenues of $71.7M. Iron Mountain's net income of $16M is lower than Innovative Industrial Properties's net income of $31.1M. Notably, Iron Mountain's price-to-earnings ratio is 250.66x while Innovative Industrial Properties's PE ratio is 10.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iron Mountain is 4.85x versus 5.33x for Innovative Industrial Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Invitation Homes has a net margin of 1% compared to Iron Mountain's net margin of 24.57%. Iron Mountain's return on equity of 236.21% beat Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.8%.

Iron Mountain has a consensus price target of $115.30, signalling upside risk potential of 12.19%. On the other hand Invitation Homes has an analysts' consensus of $37.84 which suggests that it could grow by 12.86%. Given that Invitation Homes has higher upside potential than Iron Mountain, analysts believe Invitation Homes is more attractive than Iron Mountain.

Iron Mountain has a beta of 1.090, which suggesting that the stock is 9.03% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.821, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.935%.

Iron Mountain has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. Invitation Homes offers a yield of 3.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Iron Mountain pays 438.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Invitation Homes pays out 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Iron Mountain quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Invitation Homes quarterly revenues of $674.5M. Iron Mountain's net income of $16M is lower than Invitation Homes's net income of $165.7M. Notably, Iron Mountain's price-to-earnings ratio is 250.66x while Invitation Homes's PE ratio is 43.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iron Mountain is 4.85x versus 7.77x for Invitation Homes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 1% compared to Iron Mountain's net margin of 27.45%. Iron Mountain's return on equity of 236.21% beat Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 37.22%.

Iron Mountain has a consensus price target of $115.30, signalling upside risk potential of 12.19%. On the other hand Lamar Advertising has an analysts' consensus of $129.20 which suggests that it could grow by 8.09%. Given that Iron Mountain has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe Iron Mountain is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Iron Mountain has a beta of 1.090, which suggesting that the stock is 9.03% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.346, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.639%.

Iron Mountain has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. Lamar Advertising offers a yield of 4.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share. Iron Mountain pays 438.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamar Advertising pays out 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Iron Mountain quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues of $505.4M. Iron Mountain's net income of $16M is lower than Lamar Advertising's net income of $138.8M. Notably, Iron Mountain's price-to-earnings ratio is 250.66x while Lamar Advertising's PE ratio is 29.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iron Mountain is 4.85x versus 5.54x for Lamar Advertising. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PotlatchDeltic has a net margin of 1% compared to Iron Mountain's net margin of 9.62%. Iron Mountain's return on equity of 236.21% beat PotlatchDeltic's return on equity of 2.32%.

Iron Mountain has a consensus price target of $115.30, signalling upside risk potential of 12.19%. On the other hand PotlatchDeltic has an analysts' consensus of $49.33 which suggests that it could grow by 30.82%. Given that PotlatchDeltic has higher upside potential than Iron Mountain, analysts believe PotlatchDeltic is more attractive than Iron Mountain.

Iron Mountain has a beta of 1.090, which suggesting that the stock is 9.03% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PotlatchDeltic has a beta of 1.172, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.235%.

Iron Mountain has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. PotlatchDeltic offers a yield of 4.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Iron Mountain pays 438.25% of its earnings as a dividend. PotlatchDeltic pays out 650.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Iron Mountain quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than PotlatchDeltic quarterly revenues of $268.3M. Iron Mountain's net income of $16M is lower than PotlatchDeltic's net income of $25.8M. Notably, Iron Mountain's price-to-earnings ratio is 250.66x while PotlatchDeltic's PE ratio is 61.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iron Mountain is 4.85x versus 2.71x for PotlatchDeltic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.