INVH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Equinix has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Invitation Homes's net margin of 15.42%. Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.8% beat Equinix's return on equity of 7.05%.

Invitation Homes has a consensus price target of $37.89, signalling upside risk potential of 16.54%. On the other hand Equinix has an analysts' consensus of $961.74 which suggests that it could grow by 20.95%. Given that Equinix has higher upside potential than Invitation Homes, analysts believe Equinix is more attractive than Invitation Homes.

Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.803, which suggesting that the stock is 19.693% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Equinix has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.275%.

Invitation Homes has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.54%. Equinix offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.69 per share. Invitation Homes pays 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Equinix pays out 201.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Invitation Homes quarterly revenues are $674.5M, which are smaller than Equinix quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Invitation Homes's net income of $165.7M is lower than Equinix's net income of $343M. Notably, Invitation Homes's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.22x while Equinix's PE ratio is 82.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invitation Homes is 7.53x versus 8.68x for Equinix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Iron Mountain has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Invitation Homes's net margin of 1%. Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.8% beat Iron Mountain's return on equity of 236.21%.

Invitation Homes has a consensus price target of $37.89, signalling upside risk potential of 16.54%. On the other hand Iron Mountain has an analysts' consensus of $115.30 which suggests that it could grow by 15.75%. Given that Invitation Homes has higher upside potential than Iron Mountain, analysts believe Invitation Homes is more attractive than Iron Mountain.

Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.803, which suggesting that the stock is 19.693% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Iron Mountain has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.372%.

Invitation Homes has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.54%. Iron Mountain offers a yield of 3.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Invitation Homes pays 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Iron Mountain pays out 438.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Invitation Homes quarterly revenues are $674.5M, which are smaller than Iron Mountain quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Invitation Homes's net income of $165.7M is higher than Iron Mountain's net income of $16M. Notably, Invitation Homes's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.22x while Iron Mountain's PE ratio is 242.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invitation Homes is 7.53x versus 4.71x for Iron Mountain. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Invitation Homes's net margin of 27.45%. Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.8% beat Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 37.22%.

Invitation Homes has a consensus price target of $37.89, signalling upside risk potential of 16.54%. On the other hand Lamar Advertising has an analysts' consensus of $129.20 which suggests that it could grow by 3.92%. Given that Invitation Homes has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe Invitation Homes is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.803, which suggesting that the stock is 19.693% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.334, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.358%.

Invitation Homes has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.54%. Lamar Advertising offers a yield of 4.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share. Invitation Homes pays 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamar Advertising pays out 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Invitation Homes quarterly revenues are $674.5M, which are larger than Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues of $505.4M. Invitation Homes's net income of $165.7M is higher than Lamar Advertising's net income of $138.8M. Notably, Invitation Homes's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.22x while Lamar Advertising's PE ratio is 30.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invitation Homes is 7.53x versus 5.76x for Lamar Advertising. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PotlatchDeltic has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Invitation Homes's net margin of 9.62%. Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.8% beat PotlatchDeltic's return on equity of 2.32%.

Invitation Homes has a consensus price target of $37.89, signalling upside risk potential of 16.54%. On the other hand PotlatchDeltic has an analysts' consensus of $49.33 which suggests that it could grow by 21.24%. Given that PotlatchDeltic has higher upside potential than Invitation Homes, analysts believe PotlatchDeltic is more attractive than Invitation Homes.

Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.803, which suggesting that the stock is 19.693% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PotlatchDeltic has a beta of 1.148, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.813%.

Invitation Homes has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.54%. PotlatchDeltic offers a yield of 4.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Invitation Homes pays 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. PotlatchDeltic pays out 650.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Invitation Homes quarterly revenues are $674.5M, which are larger than PotlatchDeltic quarterly revenues of $268.3M. Invitation Homes's net income of $165.7M is higher than PotlatchDeltic's net income of $25.8M. Notably, Invitation Homes's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.22x while PotlatchDeltic's PE ratio is 66.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invitation Homes is 7.53x versus 2.92x for PotlatchDeltic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.