EQIX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Invitation Homes has a net margin of 15.42% compared to Equinix's net margin of 24.57%. Equinix's return on equity of 7.05% beat Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.8%.

Equinix has a consensus price target of $1,009.12, signalling upside risk potential of 16.87%. On the other hand Invitation Homes has an analysts' consensus of $37.68 which suggests that it could grow by 14.15%. Given that Equinix has higher upside potential than Invitation Homes, analysts believe Equinix is more attractive than Invitation Homes.

Equinix has a beta of 0.975, which suggesting that the stock is 2.508% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.257%.

Equinix has a quarterly dividend of $4.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Invitation Homes offers a yield of 3.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Equinix pays 201.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Invitation Homes pays out 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinix quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Invitation Homes quarterly revenues of $674.5M. Equinix's net income of $343M is higher than Invitation Homes's net income of $165.7M. Notably, Equinix's price-to-earnings ratio is 89.76x while Invitation Homes's PE ratio is 42.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinix is 9.42x versus 7.65x for Invitation Homes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Iron Mountain has a net margin of 15.42% compared to Equinix's net margin of 1%. Equinix's return on equity of 7.05% beat Iron Mountain's return on equity of 236.21%.

Equinix has a consensus price target of $1,009.12, signalling upside risk potential of 16.87%. On the other hand Iron Mountain has an analysts' consensus of $115.30 which suggests that it could grow by 19.84%. Given that Iron Mountain has higher upside potential than Equinix, analysts believe Iron Mountain is more attractive than Equinix.

Equinix has a beta of 0.975, which suggesting that the stock is 2.508% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Iron Mountain has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.321%.

Equinix has a quarterly dividend of $4.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Iron Mountain offers a yield of 2.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Equinix pays 201.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Iron Mountain pays out 438.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinix quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Iron Mountain quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Equinix's net income of $343M is higher than Iron Mountain's net income of $16M. Notably, Equinix's price-to-earnings ratio is 89.76x while Iron Mountain's PE ratio is 234.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinix is 9.42x versus 4.54x for Iron Mountain. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 15.42% compared to Equinix's net margin of 27.45%. Equinix's return on equity of 7.05% beat Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 37.22%.

Equinix has a consensus price target of $1,009.12, signalling upside risk potential of 16.87%. On the other hand Lamar Advertising has an analysts' consensus of $125.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.4%. Given that Equinix has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe Equinix is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Equinix has a beta of 0.975, which suggesting that the stock is 2.508% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.929%.

Equinix has a quarterly dividend of $4.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Lamar Advertising offers a yield of 4.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share. Equinix pays 201.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamar Advertising pays out 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinix quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues of $505.4M. Equinix's net income of $343M is higher than Lamar Advertising's net income of $138.8M. Notably, Equinix's price-to-earnings ratio is 89.76x while Lamar Advertising's PE ratio is 27.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinix is 9.42x versus 5.35x for Lamar Advertising. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PotlatchDeltic has a net margin of 15.42% compared to Equinix's net margin of 9.62%. Equinix's return on equity of 7.05% beat PotlatchDeltic's return on equity of 2.32%.

Equinix has a consensus price target of $1,009.12, signalling upside risk potential of 16.87%. On the other hand PotlatchDeltic has an analysts' consensus of $49.56 which suggests that it could grow by 29.46%. Given that PotlatchDeltic has higher upside potential than Equinix, analysts believe PotlatchDeltic is more attractive than Equinix.

Equinix has a beta of 0.975, which suggesting that the stock is 2.508% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PotlatchDeltic has a beta of 1.167, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.72%.

Equinix has a quarterly dividend of $4.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. PotlatchDeltic offers a yield of 4.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Equinix pays 201.6% of its earnings as a dividend. PotlatchDeltic pays out 650.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinix quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than PotlatchDeltic quarterly revenues of $268.3M. Equinix's net income of $343M is higher than PotlatchDeltic's net income of $25.8M. Notably, Equinix's price-to-earnings ratio is 89.76x while PotlatchDeltic's PE ratio is 62.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinix is 9.42x versus 2.75x for PotlatchDeltic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.