LAMR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Equinix has a net margin of 27.45% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 15.42%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 37.22% beat Equinix's return on equity of 7.05%.

Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $129.20, signalling upside risk potential of 7.04%. On the other hand Equinix has an analysts' consensus of $1,010.36 which suggests that it could grow by 11.34%. Given that Equinix has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe Equinix is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.346, which suggesting that the stock is 34.639% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Equinix has a beta of 0.969, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.097%.

Lamar Advertising has a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.68%. Equinix offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.69 per share. Lamar Advertising pays 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Equinix pays out 201.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues are $505.4M, which are smaller than Equinix quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Lamar Advertising's net income of $138.8M is lower than Equinix's net income of $343M. Notably, Lamar Advertising's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.30x while Equinix's PE ratio is 94.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamar Advertising is 5.60x versus 9.90x for Equinix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Innovative Industrial Properties has a net margin of 27.45% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 43.33%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 37.22% beat Innovative Industrial Properties's return on equity of 7.9%.

Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $129.20, signalling upside risk potential of 7.04%. On the other hand Innovative Industrial Properties has an analysts' consensus of $65.60 which suggests that it could grow by 15.74%. Given that Innovative Industrial Properties has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe Innovative Industrial Properties is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.346, which suggesting that the stock is 34.639% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovative Industrial Properties has a beta of 1.701, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.127%.

Lamar Advertising has a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.68%. Innovative Industrial Properties offers a yield of 13.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. Lamar Advertising pays 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Innovative Industrial Properties pays out 132.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues are $505.4M, which are larger than Innovative Industrial Properties quarterly revenues of $71.7M. Lamar Advertising's net income of $138.8M is higher than Innovative Industrial Properties's net income of $31.1M. Notably, Lamar Advertising's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.30x while Innovative Industrial Properties's PE ratio is 10.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamar Advertising is 5.60x versus 5.31x for Innovative Industrial Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Invitation Homes has a net margin of 27.45% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 24.57%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 37.22% beat Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.8%.

Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $129.20, signalling upside risk potential of 7.04%. On the other hand Invitation Homes has an analysts' consensus of $37.84 which suggests that it could grow by 14.01%. Given that Invitation Homes has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe Invitation Homes is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.346, which suggesting that the stock is 34.639% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.821, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.935%.

Lamar Advertising has a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.68%. Invitation Homes offers a yield of 3.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Lamar Advertising pays 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Invitation Homes pays out 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues are $505.4M, which are smaller than Invitation Homes quarterly revenues of $674.5M. Lamar Advertising's net income of $138.8M is lower than Invitation Homes's net income of $165.7M. Notably, Lamar Advertising's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.30x while Invitation Homes's PE ratio is 43.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamar Advertising is 5.60x versus 7.69x for Invitation Homes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PotlatchDeltic has a net margin of 27.45% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 9.62%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 37.22% beat PotlatchDeltic's return on equity of 2.32%.

Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $129.20, signalling upside risk potential of 7.04%. On the other hand PotlatchDeltic has an analysts' consensus of $49.33 which suggests that it could grow by 25.85%. Given that PotlatchDeltic has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe PotlatchDeltic is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.346, which suggesting that the stock is 34.639% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PotlatchDeltic has a beta of 1.172, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.235%.

Lamar Advertising has a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.68%. PotlatchDeltic offers a yield of 4.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Lamar Advertising pays 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. PotlatchDeltic pays out 650.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues are $505.4M, which are larger than PotlatchDeltic quarterly revenues of $268.3M. Lamar Advertising's net income of $138.8M is higher than PotlatchDeltic's net income of $25.8M. Notably, Lamar Advertising's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.30x while PotlatchDeltic's PE ratio is 64.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamar Advertising is 5.60x versus 2.82x for PotlatchDeltic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.