HRL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Beyond Meat has a net margin of 6.21% compared to Hormel Foods's net margin of -76.99%. Hormel Foods's return on equity of 9.38% beat Beyond Meat's return on equity of --.

Hormel Foods has a consensus price target of $32.32, signalling upside risk potential of 6.74%. On the other hand Beyond Meat has an analysts' consensus of $2.75 which suggests that it could fall by -16.54%. Given that Hormel Foods has higher upside potential than Beyond Meat, analysts believe Hormel Foods is more attractive than Beyond Meat.

Hormel Foods has a beta of 0.334, which suggesting that the stock is 66.628% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Beyond Meat has a beta of 2.151, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.115%.

Hormel Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.78%. Beyond Meat offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hormel Foods pays 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Beyond Meat pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hormel Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hormel Foods quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Beyond Meat quarterly revenues of $68.7M. Hormel Foods's net income of $180M is higher than Beyond Meat's net income of -$52.9M. Notably, Hormel Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.26x while Beyond Meat's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hormel Foods is 1.40x versus 0.71x for Beyond Meat. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Oak Hereford Farms has a net margin of 6.21% compared to Hormel Foods's net margin of --. Hormel Foods's return on equity of 9.38% beat Red Oak Hereford Farms's return on equity of --.

Hormel Foods has a consensus price target of $32.32, signalling upside risk potential of 6.74%. On the other hand Red Oak Hereford Farms has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hormel Foods has higher upside potential than Red Oak Hereford Farms, analysts believe Hormel Foods is more attractive than Red Oak Hereford Farms.

Hormel Foods has a beta of 0.334, which suggesting that the stock is 66.628% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Oak Hereford Farms has a beta of 2.805, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 180.473%.

Hormel Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.78%. Red Oak Hereford Farms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hormel Foods pays 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Red Oak Hereford Farms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hormel Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hormel Foods quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Red Oak Hereford Farms quarterly revenues of --. Hormel Foods's net income of $180M is higher than Red Oak Hereford Farms's net income of --. Notably, Hormel Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.26x while Red Oak Hereford Farms's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hormel Foods is 1.40x versus -- for Red Oak Hereford Farms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 6.21% compared to Hormel Foods's net margin of 0.13%. Hormel Foods's return on equity of 9.38% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 2.84%.

Hormel Foods has a consensus price target of $32.32, signalling upside risk potential of 6.74%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $83.57 which suggests that it could grow by 57.95%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Hormel Foods, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Hormel Foods.

Hormel Foods has a beta of 0.334, which suggesting that the stock is 66.628% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.933, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.666%.

Hormel Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.78%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Hormel Foods pays 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hormel Foods quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $675.7M. Hormel Foods's net income of $180M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $900K. Notably, Hormel Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.26x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 25.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hormel Foods is 1.40x versus 0.50x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tyson Foods has a net margin of 6.21% compared to Hormel Foods's net margin of 0.05%. Hormel Foods's return on equity of 9.38% beat Tyson Foods's return on equity of 4.96%.

Hormel Foods has a consensus price target of $32.32, signalling upside risk potential of 6.74%. On the other hand Tyson Foods has an analysts' consensus of $66.10 which suggests that it could grow by 20.4%. Given that Tyson Foods has higher upside potential than Hormel Foods, analysts believe Tyson Foods is more attractive than Hormel Foods.

Hormel Foods has a beta of 0.334, which suggesting that the stock is 66.628% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.598, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.227%.

Hormel Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.78%. Tyson Foods offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Hormel Foods pays 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods pays out 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hormel Foods quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Tyson Foods quarterly revenues of $13.1B. Hormel Foods's net income of $180M is higher than Tyson Foods's net income of $7M. Notably, Hormel Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.26x while Tyson Foods's PE ratio is 21.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hormel Foods is 1.40x versus 0.37x for Tyson Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.