TSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Clorox has a net margin of 0.05% compared to Tyson Foods's net margin of 11.15%. Tyson Foods's return on equity of 4.96% beat Clorox's return on equity of 270.67%.

Tyson Foods has a consensus price target of $66.03, signalling upside risk potential of 19.41%. On the other hand Clorox has an analysts' consensus of $149.27 which suggests that it could grow by 10.77%. Given that Tyson Foods has higher upside potential than Clorox, analysts believe Tyson Foods is more attractive than Clorox.

Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.632, which suggesting that the stock is 36.837% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clorox has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.57%.

Tyson Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. Clorox offers a yield of 3.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Tyson Foods pays 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Clorox pays out 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Tyson Foods quarterly revenues are $13.1B, which are larger than Clorox quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Tyson Foods's net income of $7M is lower than Clorox's net income of $186M. Notably, Tyson Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.52x while Clorox's PE ratio is 24.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tyson Foods is 0.37x versus 2.39x for Clorox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hormel Foods has a net margin of 0.05% compared to Tyson Foods's net margin of 5.71%. Tyson Foods's return on equity of 4.96% beat Hormel Foods's return on equity of 9.54%.

Tyson Foods has a consensus price target of $66.03, signalling upside risk potential of 19.41%. On the other hand Hormel Foods has an analysts' consensus of $32.02 which suggests that it could grow by 9.63%. Given that Tyson Foods has higher upside potential than Hormel Foods, analysts believe Tyson Foods is more attractive than Hormel Foods.

Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.632, which suggesting that the stock is 36.837% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hormel Foods has a beta of 0.338, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.217%.

Tyson Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. Hormel Foods offers a yield of 3.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Tyson Foods pays 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Hormel Foods pays out 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tyson Foods quarterly revenues are $13.1B, which are larger than Hormel Foods quarterly revenues of $3B. Tyson Foods's net income of $7M is lower than Hormel Foods's net income of $170.6M. Notably, Tyson Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.52x while Hormel Foods's PE ratio is 21.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tyson Foods is 0.37x versus 1.35x for Hormel Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lancaster Colony has a net margin of 0.05% compared to Tyson Foods's net margin of 8.98%. Tyson Foods's return on equity of 4.96% beat Lancaster Colony's return on equity of 17.82%.

Tyson Foods has a consensus price target of $66.03, signalling upside risk potential of 19.41%. On the other hand Lancaster Colony has an analysts' consensus of $194.90 which suggests that it could grow by 16.99%. Given that Tyson Foods has higher upside potential than Lancaster Colony, analysts believe Tyson Foods is more attractive than Lancaster Colony.

Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.632, which suggesting that the stock is 36.837% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lancaster Colony has a beta of 0.499, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.13%.

Tyson Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. Lancaster Colony offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share. Tyson Foods pays 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Lancaster Colony pays out 61.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tyson Foods quarterly revenues are $13.1B, which are larger than Lancaster Colony quarterly revenues of $457.8M. Tyson Foods's net income of $7M is lower than Lancaster Colony's net income of $41.1M. Notably, Tyson Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.52x while Lancaster Colony's PE ratio is 27.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tyson Foods is 0.37x versus 2.43x for Lancaster Colony. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pilgrims Pride has a net margin of 0.05% compared to Tyson Foods's net margin of 6.63%. Tyson Foods's return on equity of 4.96% beat Pilgrims Pride's return on equity of 32.03%.

Tyson Foods has a consensus price target of $66.03, signalling upside risk potential of 19.41%. On the other hand Pilgrims Pride has an analysts' consensus of $48.26 which suggests that it could grow by 2.54%. Given that Tyson Foods has higher upside potential than Pilgrims Pride, analysts believe Tyson Foods is more attractive than Pilgrims Pride.

Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.632, which suggesting that the stock is 36.837% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pilgrims Pride has a beta of 0.506, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.436%.

Tyson Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. Pilgrims Pride offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $6.30 per share. Tyson Foods pays 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Pilgrims Pride pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tyson Foods quarterly revenues are $13.1B, which are larger than Pilgrims Pride quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Tyson Foods's net income of $7M is lower than Pilgrims Pride's net income of $296M. Notably, Tyson Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.52x while Pilgrims Pride's PE ratio is 9.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tyson Foods is 0.37x versus 0.62x for Pilgrims Pride. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.