BYND Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mission Produce has a net margin of -76.99% compared to Beyond Meat's net margin of 0.82%. Beyond Meat's return on equity of -- beat Mission Produce's return on equity of 6.47%.

Beyond Meat has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling downside risk potential of -19.93%. On the other hand Mission Produce has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 38.66%. Given that Mission Produce has higher upside potential than Beyond Meat, analysts believe Mission Produce is more attractive than Beyond Meat.

Beyond Meat has a beta of 2.151, which suggesting that the stock is 115.115% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mission Produce has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Beyond Meat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mission Produce offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Beyond Meat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mission Produce pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Beyond Meat quarterly revenues are $68.7M, which are smaller than Mission Produce quarterly revenues of $380.3M. Beyond Meat's net income of -$52.9M is lower than Mission Produce's net income of $3.1M. Notably, Beyond Meat's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mission Produce's PE ratio is 24.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beyond Meat is 0.74x versus 0.63x for Mission Produce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Oak Hereford Farms has a net margin of -76.99% compared to Beyond Meat's net margin of --. Beyond Meat's return on equity of -- beat Red Oak Hereford Farms's return on equity of --.

Beyond Meat has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling downside risk potential of -19.93%. On the other hand Red Oak Hereford Farms has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Beyond Meat has higher upside potential than Red Oak Hereford Farms, analysts believe Beyond Meat is more attractive than Red Oak Hereford Farms.

Beyond Meat has a beta of 2.151, which suggesting that the stock is 115.115% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Oak Hereford Farms has a beta of 2.805, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 180.473%.

Beyond Meat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Oak Hereford Farms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Beyond Meat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Oak Hereford Farms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Beyond Meat quarterly revenues are $68.7M, which are larger than Red Oak Hereford Farms quarterly revenues of --. Beyond Meat's net income of -$52.9M is higher than Red Oak Hereford Farms's net income of --. Notably, Beyond Meat's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Red Oak Hereford Farms's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beyond Meat is 0.74x versus -- for Red Oak Hereford Farms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hormel Foods has a net margin of -76.99% compared to Beyond Meat's net margin of 6.21%. Beyond Meat's return on equity of -- beat Hormel Foods's return on equity of 9.38%.

Beyond Meat has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling downside risk potential of -19.93%. On the other hand Hormel Foods has an analysts' consensus of $32.32 which suggests that it could grow by 4.77%. Given that Hormel Foods has higher upside potential than Beyond Meat, analysts believe Hormel Foods is more attractive than Beyond Meat.

Beyond Meat has a beta of 2.151, which suggesting that the stock is 115.115% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hormel Foods has a beta of 0.334, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.628%.

Beyond Meat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hormel Foods offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Beyond Meat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hormel Foods pays out 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Hormel Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Beyond Meat quarterly revenues are $68.7M, which are smaller than Hormel Foods quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Beyond Meat's net income of -$52.9M is lower than Hormel Foods's net income of $180M. Notably, Beyond Meat's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hormel Foods's PE ratio is 22.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beyond Meat is 0.74x versus 1.42x for Hormel Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of -76.99% compared to Beyond Meat's net margin of 0.13%. Beyond Meat's return on equity of -- beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 2.84%.

Beyond Meat has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling downside risk potential of -19.93%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $83.57 which suggests that it could grow by 59.12%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Beyond Meat, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Beyond Meat.

Beyond Meat has a beta of 2.151, which suggesting that the stock is 115.115% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.933, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.666%.

Beyond Meat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 3.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Beyond Meat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Beyond Meat quarterly revenues are $68.7M, which are smaller than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $675.7M. Beyond Meat's net income of -$52.9M is lower than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $900K. Notably, Beyond Meat's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 25.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beyond Meat is 0.74x versus 0.50x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.