GLW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 4.55% compared to Corning's net margin of 9.53%. Corning's return on equity of 4.04% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 3.91%.

Corning has a consensus price target of $52.18, signalling upside risk potential of 4.44%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $127.53 which suggests that it could grow by 12.83%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has higher upside potential than Corning, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than Corning.

Corning has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.969, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.904%.

Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corning pays 194.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Corning quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Corning's net income of $157M is lower than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $709M. Notably, Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 96.08x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 83.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning is 3.18x versus 6.65x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Broadcom has a net margin of 4.55% compared to Corning's net margin of 36.89%. Corning's return on equity of 4.04% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 14.67%.

Corning has a consensus price target of $52.18, signalling upside risk potential of 4.44%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $245.23 which suggests that it could grow by 1.35%. Given that Corning has higher upside potential than Broadcom, analysts believe Corning is more attractive than Broadcom.

Corning has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.046, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.6%.

Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Broadcom offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Corning pays 194.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Corning quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $14.9B. Corning's net income of $157M is lower than Broadcom's net income of $5.5B. Notably, Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 96.08x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 116.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning is 3.18x versus 21.22x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First Solar has a net margin of 4.55% compared to Corning's net margin of 24.81%. Corning's return on equity of 4.04% beat First Solar's return on equity of 16.68%.

Corning has a consensus price target of $52.18, signalling upside risk potential of 4.44%. On the other hand First Solar has an analysts' consensus of $201.02 which suggests that it could grow by 28.9%. Given that First Solar has higher upside potential than Corning, analysts believe First Solar is more attractive than Corning.

Corning has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Solar has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.463%.

Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. First Solar offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corning pays 194.86% of its earnings as a dividend. First Solar pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Corning quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than First Solar quarterly revenues of $844.6M. Corning's net income of $157M is lower than First Solar's net income of $209.5M. Notably, Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 96.08x while First Solar's PE ratio is 13.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning is 3.18x versus 3.94x for First Solar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 4.55% compared to Corning's net margin of 42.61%. Corning's return on equity of 4.04% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

Corning has a consensus price target of $52.18, signalling upside risk potential of 4.44%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $169.83 which suggests that it could grow by 21.73%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Corning, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Corning.

Corning has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.113, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.31%.

Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Corning pays 194.86% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Corning's is not.

Corning quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. Corning's net income of $157M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 96.08x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 44.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning is 3.18x versus 23.18x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.