GLW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadcom has a net margin of 4.55% compared to Corning's net margin of 33.09%. Corning's return on equity of 4.04% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 18.85%.

Corning has a consensus price target of $52.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.51%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $280.59 which suggests that it could grow by 12.82%. Given that Broadcom has higher upside potential than Corning, analysts believe Broadcom is more attractive than Corning.

Corning has a beta of 1.114, which suggesting that the stock is 11.42% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.110, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.036%.

Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. Broadcom offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Corning pays 194.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Corning quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $15B. Corning's net income of $157M is lower than Broadcom's net income of $5B. Notably, Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.38x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 93.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning is 3.15x versus 20.87x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

M-Tron Industries has a net margin of 4.55% compared to Corning's net margin of --. Corning's return on equity of 4.04% beat M-Tron Industries's return on equity of --.

Corning has a consensus price target of $52.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.51%. On the other hand M-Tron Industries has an analysts' consensus of $67.00 which suggests that it could grow by 47.81%. Given that M-Tron Industries has higher upside potential than Corning, analysts believe M-Tron Industries is more attractive than Corning.

Corning has a beta of 1.114, which suggesting that the stock is 11.42% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison M-Tron Industries has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. M-Tron Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corning pays 194.86% of its earnings as a dividend. M-Tron Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Corning quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than M-Tron Industries quarterly revenues of --. Corning's net income of $157M is higher than M-Tron Industries's net income of --. Notably, Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.38x while M-Tron Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning is 3.15x versus 8.91x for M-Tron Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 4.55% compared to Corning's net margin of 42.61%. Corning's return on equity of 4.04% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

Corning has a consensus price target of $52.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.51%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.11 which suggests that it could grow by 21.23%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Corning, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Corning.

Corning has a beta of 1.114, which suggesting that the stock is 11.42% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.079%.

Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Corning pays 194.86% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Corning's is not.

Corning quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. Corning's net income of $157M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.38x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 45.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning is 3.15x versus 23.64x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vuzix has a net margin of 4.55% compared to Corning's net margin of -546.36%. Corning's return on equity of 4.04% beat Vuzix's return on equity of -165.25%.

Corning has a consensus price target of $52.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.51%. On the other hand Vuzix has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could fall by -2.28%. Given that Corning has higher upside potential than Vuzix, analysts believe Corning is more attractive than Vuzix.

Corning has a beta of 1.114, which suggesting that the stock is 11.42% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vuzix has a beta of 1.655, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.508%.

Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. Vuzix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corning pays 194.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Vuzix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Corning quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Vuzix quarterly revenues of $1.6M. Corning's net income of $157M is higher than Vuzix's net income of -$8.6M. Notably, Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.38x while Vuzix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning is 3.15x versus 40.63x for Vuzix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.