GIS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Campbell's has a net margin of 12.92% compared to General Mills's net margin of 6.44%. General Mills's return on equity of 26.75% beat The Campbell's's return on equity of 13.49%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $62.05, signalling upside risk potential of 13.42%. On the other hand The Campbell's has an analysts' consensus of $42.77 which suggests that it could grow by 20.19%. Given that The Campbell's has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe The Campbell's is more attractive than General Mills.

General Mills has a beta of 0.047, which suggesting that the stock is 95.326% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Campbell's has a beta of 0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.188%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.39%. The Campbell's offers a yield of 4.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. The Campbell's pays out 78.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than The Campbell's quarterly revenues of $2.7B. General Mills's net income of $625.6M is higher than The Campbell's's net income of $173M. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.02x while The Campbell's's PE ratio is 20.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.57x versus 1.06x for The Campbell's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a net margin of 12.92% compared to General Mills's net margin of 9.6%. General Mills's return on equity of 26.75% beat Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $62.05, signalling upside risk potential of 13.42%. On the other hand Lamb Weston Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $66.58 which suggests that it could grow by 29.38%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than General Mills.

General Mills has a beta of 0.047, which suggesting that the stock is 95.326% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.466, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.446%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.39%. Lamb Weston Holdings offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings pays out 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5B. General Mills's net income of $625.6M is higher than Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.02x while Lamb Weston Holdings's PE ratio is 20.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.57x versus 1.16x for Lamb Weston Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 12.92% compared to General Mills's net margin of 10.24%. General Mills's return on equity of 26.75% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $62.05, signalling upside risk potential of 13.42%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $151.55 which suggests that it could grow by 15.31%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than General Mills.

General Mills has a beta of 0.047, which suggesting that the stock is 95.326% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.85%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.39%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 4.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $17.9B. General Mills's net income of $625.6M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.02x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 19.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.57x versus 1.98x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pilgrims Pride has a net margin of 12.92% compared to General Mills's net margin of 6.63%. General Mills's return on equity of 26.75% beat Pilgrims Pride's return on equity of 32.03%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $62.05, signalling upside risk potential of 13.42%. On the other hand Pilgrims Pride has an analysts' consensus of $48.26 which suggests that it could grow by 2.04%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than Pilgrims Pride, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than Pilgrims Pride.

General Mills has a beta of 0.047, which suggesting that the stock is 95.326% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pilgrims Pride has a beta of 0.506, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.436%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.39%. Pilgrims Pride offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $6.30 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Pilgrims Pride pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Pilgrims Pride quarterly revenues of $4.5B. General Mills's net income of $625.6M is higher than Pilgrims Pride's net income of $296M. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.02x while Pilgrims Pride's PE ratio is 9.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.57x versus 0.63x for Pilgrims Pride. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.