CAG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Campbell's has a net margin of 5.11% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of 2.67%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 3.74% beat The Campbell's's return on equity of 11.74%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $25.14, signalling upside risk potential of 16.56%. On the other hand The Campbell's has an analysts' consensus of $38.89 which suggests that it could grow by 18.61%. Given that The Campbell's has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe The Campbell's is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.138, which suggesting that the stock is 86.174% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Campbell's has a beta of 0.106, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.379%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.49%. The Campbell's offers a yield of 4.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. The Campbell's pays out 78.48% of its earnings as a dividend. The Campbell's's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than The Campbell's quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Conagra Brands's net income of $145.1M is higher than The Campbell's's net income of $66M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.72x while The Campbell's's PE ratio is 21.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 0.88x versus 0.96x for The Campbell's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Mills has a net margin of 5.11% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of 12.92%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 3.74% beat General Mills's return on equity of 26.75%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $25.14, signalling upside risk potential of 16.56%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $60.78 which suggests that it could grow by 13.48%. Given that Conagra Brands has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe Conagra Brands is more attractive than General Mills.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.138, which suggesting that the stock is 86.174% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.015, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.47%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.49%. General Mills offers a yield of 4.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Conagra Brands's net income of $145.1M is lower than General Mills's net income of $625.6M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.72x while General Mills's PE ratio is 11.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 0.88x versus 1.53x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 5.11% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of 11.87%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 3.74% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.39%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $25.14, signalling upside risk potential of 16.56%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $31.48 which suggests that it could grow by 20.71%. Given that The Kraft Heinz has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe The Kraft Heinz is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.138, which suggesting that the stock is 86.174% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.267, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.273%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.49%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 6.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6B. Conagra Brands's net income of $145.1M is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $712M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.72x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 11.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 0.88x versus 1.24x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a net margin of 5.11% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of 9.6%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 3.74% beat Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $25.14, signalling upside risk potential of 16.56%. On the other hand Lamb Weston Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $65.22 which suggests that it could grow by 19.02%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.138, which suggesting that the stock is 86.174% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.490, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.048%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.49%. Lamb Weston Holdings offers a yield of 2.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings pays out 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Conagra Brands's net income of $145.1M is lower than Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.72x while Lamb Weston Holdings's PE ratio is 21.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 0.88x versus 1.23x for Lamb Weston Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.