MKC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Mills has a net margin of 10.55% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of 6.45%. McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.26% beat General Mills's return on equity of 24.24%.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of $82.95, signalling upside risk potential of 15.27%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $55.86 which suggests that it could grow by 9.6%. Given that McCormick & has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe McCormick & is more attractive than General Mills.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.684, which suggesting that the stock is 31.648% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.003, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.692%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.46%. General Mills offers a yield of 4.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. McCormick & pays 57.2% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 58.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $4.6B. McCormick &'s net income of $175M is lower than General Mills's net income of $294M. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.99x while General Mills's PE ratio is 12.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 2.88x versus 1.46x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 10.55% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of 11.87%. McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.26% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.39%.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of $82.95, signalling upside risk potential of 15.27%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $31.48 which suggests that it could grow by 13.24%. Given that McCormick & has higher upside potential than The Kraft Heinz, analysts believe McCormick & is more attractive than The Kraft Heinz.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.684, which suggesting that the stock is 31.648% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.252, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.802%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.46%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. McCormick & pays 57.2% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6B. McCormick &'s net income of $175M is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $712M. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.99x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 12.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 2.88x versus 1.32x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mondelez International has a net margin of 10.55% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of 4.32%. McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.26% beat Mondelez International's return on equity of 13.15%.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of $82.95, signalling upside risk potential of 15.27%. On the other hand Mondelez International has an analysts' consensus of $72.93 which suggests that it could grow by 7.82%. Given that McCormick & has higher upside potential than Mondelez International, analysts believe McCormick & is more attractive than Mondelez International.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.684, which suggesting that the stock is 31.648% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mondelez International has a beta of 0.478, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.162%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.46%. Mondelez International offers a yield of 2.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. McCormick & pays 57.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International pays out 50.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Mondelez International quarterly revenues of $9.3B. McCormick &'s net income of $175M is lower than Mondelez International's net income of $402M. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.99x while Mondelez International's PE ratio is 25.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 2.88x versus 2.48x for Mondelez International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 10.55% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of 0.13%. McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.26% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 2.84%.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of $82.95, signalling upside risk potential of 15.27%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $81.14 which suggests that it could grow by 43.87%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than McCormick &, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than McCormick &.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.684, which suggesting that the stock is 31.648% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.074%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.46%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 3.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. McCormick & pays 57.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $675.7M. McCormick &'s net income of $175M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $900K. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.99x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 26.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 2.88x versus 0.54x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.