CCL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a net margin of 8.93% compared to Carnival's net margin of -1.89%. Carnival's return on equity of 28.79% beat Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's return on equity of 84.71%.

Carnival has a consensus price target of $30.98, signalling upside risk potential of 6.46%. On the other hand Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $25.13 which suggests that it could grow by 8.56%. Given that Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has higher upside potential than Carnival, analysts believe Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is more attractive than Carnival.

Carnival has a beta of 2.606, which suggesting that the stock is 160.563% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a beta of 2.134, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.4%.

Carnival has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carnival pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carnival quarterly revenues are $6.3B, which are larger than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Carnival's net income of $565M is higher than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's net income of -$40.3M. Notably, Carnival's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.73x while Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's PE ratio is 13.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carnival is 1.54x versus 1.22x for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nike has a net margin of 8.93% compared to Carnival's net margin of 1.9%. Carnival's return on equity of 28.79% beat Nike's return on equity of 23.12%.

Carnival has a consensus price target of $30.98, signalling upside risk potential of 6.46%. On the other hand Nike has an analysts' consensus of $75.77 which suggests that it could grow by 1.54%. Given that Carnival has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Carnival is more attractive than Nike.

Carnival has a beta of 2.606, which suggesting that the stock is 160.563% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nike has a beta of 1.250, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.963%.

Carnival has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nike offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Carnival pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carnival quarterly revenues are $6.3B, which are smaller than Nike quarterly revenues of $11.1B. Carnival's net income of $565M is higher than Nike's net income of $211M. Notably, Carnival's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.73x while Nike's PE ratio is 34.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carnival is 1.54x versus 2.40x for Nike. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Royal Caribbean Group has a net margin of 8.93% compared to Carnival's net margin of 18.26%. Carnival's return on equity of 28.79% beat Royal Caribbean Group's return on equity of 46.91%.

Carnival has a consensus price target of $30.98, signalling upside risk potential of 6.46%. On the other hand Royal Caribbean Group has an analysts' consensus of $291.35 which suggests that it could fall by -14.65%. Given that Carnival has higher upside potential than Royal Caribbean Group, analysts believe Carnival is more attractive than Royal Caribbean Group.

Carnival has a beta of 2.606, which suggesting that the stock is 160.563% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Royal Caribbean Group has a beta of 2.172, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 117.222%.

Carnival has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Royal Caribbean Group offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Carnival pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Caribbean Group pays out 3.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Caribbean Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carnival quarterly revenues are $6.3B, which are larger than Royal Caribbean Group quarterly revenues of $4B. Carnival's net income of $565M is lower than Royal Caribbean Group's net income of $730M. Notably, Carnival's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.73x while Royal Caribbean Group's PE ratio is 28.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carnival is 1.54x versus 5.59x for Royal Caribbean Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 8.93% compared to Carnival's net margin of 2.12%. Carnival's return on equity of 28.79% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Carnival has a consensus price target of $30.98, signalling upside risk potential of 6.46%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $304.17 which suggests that it could fall by -1.6%. Given that Carnival has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Carnival is more attractive than Tesla.

Carnival has a beta of 2.606, which suggesting that the stock is 160.563% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.394, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.423%.

Carnival has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carnival pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carnival quarterly revenues are $6.3B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Carnival's net income of $565M is higher than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Carnival's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.73x while Tesla's PE ratio is 170.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carnival is 1.54x versus 11.35x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.