RCL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amazon.com has a net margin of 18.26% compared to Royal Caribbean Group's net margin of 11%. Royal Caribbean Group's return on equity of 46.91% beat Amazon.com's return on equity of 25.28%.

Royal Caribbean Group has a consensus price target of $269.26, signalling upside risk potential of 1.72%. On the other hand Amazon.com has an analysts' consensus of $239.76 which suggests that it could grow by 10.95%. Given that Amazon.com has higher upside potential than Royal Caribbean Group, analysts believe Amazon.com is more attractive than Royal Caribbean Group.

Royal Caribbean Group has a beta of 2.140, which suggesting that the stock is 113.958% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amazon.com has a beta of 1.336, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.628%.

Royal Caribbean Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Amazon.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Royal Caribbean Group pays 3.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Amazon.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Caribbean Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal Caribbean Group quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Amazon.com quarterly revenues of $155.7B. Royal Caribbean Group's net income of $730M is lower than Amazon.com's net income of $17.1B. Notably, Royal Caribbean Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.91x while Amazon.com's PE ratio is 35.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Caribbean Group is 4.33x versus 3.57x for Amazon.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Carnival has a net margin of 18.26% compared to Royal Caribbean Group's net margin of -1.34%. Royal Caribbean Group's return on equity of 46.91% beat Carnival's return on equity of 25.32%.

Royal Caribbean Group has a consensus price target of $269.26, signalling upside risk potential of 1.72%. On the other hand Carnival has an analysts' consensus of $28.29 which suggests that it could grow by 18.65%. Given that Carnival has higher upside potential than Royal Caribbean Group, analysts believe Carnival is more attractive than Royal Caribbean Group.

Royal Caribbean Group has a beta of 2.140, which suggesting that the stock is 113.958% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carnival has a beta of 2.580, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.996%.

Royal Caribbean Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Carnival offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Royal Caribbean Group pays 3.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Carnival pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Caribbean Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal Caribbean Group quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Carnival quarterly revenues of $5.8B. Royal Caribbean Group's net income of $730M is higher than Carnival's net income of -$78M. Notably, Royal Caribbean Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.91x while Carnival's PE ratio is 15.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Caribbean Group is 4.33x versus 1.26x for Carnival. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a net margin of 18.26% compared to Royal Caribbean Group's net margin of 11.13%. Royal Caribbean Group's return on equity of 46.91% beat Hilton Worldwide Holdings's return on equity of --.

Royal Caribbean Group has a consensus price target of $269.26, signalling upside risk potential of 1.72%. On the other hand Hilton Worldwide Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $248.93 which suggests that it could grow by 0.64%. Given that Royal Caribbean Group has higher upside potential than Hilton Worldwide Holdings, analysts believe Royal Caribbean Group is more attractive than Hilton Worldwide Holdings.

Royal Caribbean Group has a beta of 2.140, which suggesting that the stock is 113.958% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a beta of 1.241, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.125%.

Royal Caribbean Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Hilton Worldwide Holdings offers a yield of 0.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Royal Caribbean Group pays 3.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Hilton Worldwide Holdings pays out 9.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal Caribbean Group quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Hilton Worldwide Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Royal Caribbean Group's net income of $730M is higher than Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net income of $300M. Notably, Royal Caribbean Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.91x while Hilton Worldwide Holdings's PE ratio is 39.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Caribbean Group is 4.33x versus 5.41x for Hilton Worldwide Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a net margin of 18.26% compared to Royal Caribbean Group's net margin of -1.89%. Royal Caribbean Group's return on equity of 46.91% beat Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's return on equity of 84.71%.

Royal Caribbean Group has a consensus price target of $269.26, signalling upside risk potential of 1.72%. On the other hand Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $24.90 which suggests that it could grow by 34.26%. Given that Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has higher upside potential than Royal Caribbean Group, analysts believe Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is more attractive than Royal Caribbean Group.

Royal Caribbean Group has a beta of 2.140, which suggesting that the stock is 113.958% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a beta of 2.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.964%.

Royal Caribbean Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Royal Caribbean Group pays 3.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Caribbean Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal Caribbean Group quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Royal Caribbean Group's net income of $730M is higher than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's net income of -$40.3M. Notably, Royal Caribbean Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.91x while Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's PE ratio is 10.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Caribbean Group is 4.33x versus 0.98x for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.