NKE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Deckers Outdoor has a net margin of 1.9% compared to Nike's net margin of 14.82%. Nike's return on equity of 23.12% beat Deckers Outdoor's return on equity of 41.83%.

Nike has a consensus price target of $76.25, signalling upside risk potential of 5.21%. On the other hand Deckers Outdoor has an analysts' consensus of $123.86 which suggests that it could grow by 21.53%. Given that Deckers Outdoor has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Deckers Outdoor is more attractive than Nike.

Nike has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 24.963% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deckers Outdoor has a beta of 0.990, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.993%.

Nike has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.17%. Deckers Outdoor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nike pays 71.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Deckers Outdoor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nike quarterly revenues are $11.1B, which are larger than Deckers Outdoor quarterly revenues of $1B. Nike's net income of $211M is higher than Deckers Outdoor's net income of $151.4M. Notably, Nike's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.55x while Deckers Outdoor's PE ratio is 16.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nike is 2.33x versus 3.12x for Deckers Outdoor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skechers USA has a net margin of 1.9% compared to Nike's net margin of 8.39%. Nike's return on equity of 23.12% beat Skechers USA's return on equity of 13.25%.

Nike has a consensus price target of $76.25, signalling upside risk potential of 5.21%. On the other hand Skechers USA has an analysts' consensus of $62.55 which suggests that it could fall by -0.84%. Given that Nike has higher upside potential than Skechers USA, analysts believe Nike is more attractive than Skechers USA.

Nike has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 24.963% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skechers USA has a beta of 1.123, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.276%.

Nike has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.17%. Skechers USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nike pays 71.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Skechers USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nike quarterly revenues are $11.1B, which are larger than Skechers USA quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Nike's net income of $211M is higher than Skechers USA's net income of $202.4M. Notably, Nike's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.55x while Skechers USA's PE ratio is 15.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nike is 2.33x versus 1.06x for Skechers USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 1.9% compared to Nike's net margin of 2.12%. Nike's return on equity of 23.12% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Nike has a consensus price target of $76.25, signalling upside risk potential of 5.21%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $304.17 which suggests that it could fall by -7.73%. Given that Nike has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Nike is more attractive than Tesla.

Nike has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 24.963% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.394, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.423%.

Nike has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.17%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nike pays 71.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nike quarterly revenues are $11.1B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Nike's net income of $211M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Nike's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.55x while Tesla's PE ratio is 181.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nike is 2.33x versus 12.07x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolverine World Wide has a net margin of 1.9% compared to Nike's net margin of 2.69%. Nike's return on equity of 23.12% beat Wolverine World Wide's return on equity of 25.09%.

Nike has a consensus price target of $76.25, signalling upside risk potential of 5.21%. On the other hand Wolverine World Wide has an analysts' consensus of $21.44 which suggests that it could grow by 5.02%. Given that Nike has higher upside potential than Wolverine World Wide, analysts believe Nike is more attractive than Wolverine World Wide.

Nike has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 24.963% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolverine World Wide has a beta of 1.703, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.271%.

Nike has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.17%. Wolverine World Wide offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Nike pays 71.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolverine World Wide pays out 67.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nike quarterly revenues are $11.1B, which are larger than Wolverine World Wide quarterly revenues of $412.3M. Nike's net income of $211M is higher than Wolverine World Wide's net income of $11.1M. Notably, Nike's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.55x while Wolverine World Wide's PE ratio is 23.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nike is 2.33x versus 0.92x for Wolverine World Wide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.