ADM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bunge Global SA has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of 1.71%. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 7.6% beat Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 10.16%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.81%. On the other hand Bunge Global SA has an analysts' consensus of $106.63 which suggests that it could grow by 34.89%. Given that Bunge Global SA has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels Midland, analysts believe Bunge Global SA is more attractive than Archer-Daniels Midland.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.718, which suggesting that the stock is 28.225% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.678, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.199%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. Bunge Global SA offers a yield of 3.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 28.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Bunge Global SA pays out 17.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $19.9B, which are larger than Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues of $12.9B. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $18M is lower than Bunge Global SA's net income of $221M. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.32x while Bunge Global SA's PE ratio is 10.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.29x versus 0.21x for Bunge Global SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingredion has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of 10.05%. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 7.6% beat Ingredion's return on equity of 18.21%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.81%. On the other hand Ingredion has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.12%. Given that Ingredion has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels Midland, analysts believe Ingredion is more attractive than Archer-Daniels Midland.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.718, which suggesting that the stock is 28.225% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingredion has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.452%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. Ingredion offers a yield of 2.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 28.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingredion pays out 30.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $19.9B, which are larger than Ingredion quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $18M is lower than Ingredion's net income of $188M. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.32x while Ingredion's PE ratio is 13.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.29x versus 1.23x for Ingredion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of --. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 7.6% beat RegalWorks Media's return on equity of --.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.81%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Archer-Daniels Midland has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, analysts believe Archer-Daniels Midland is more attractive than RegalWorks Media.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.718, which suggesting that the stock is 28.225% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media has a beta of 0.010, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.048%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. RegalWorks Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 28.05% of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Archer-Daniels Midland's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $19.9B, which are larger than RegalWorks Media quarterly revenues of --. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $18M is higher than RegalWorks Media's net income of --. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.32x while RegalWorks Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.29x versus -- for RegalWorks Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of 3.7%. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 7.6% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.81%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 23.75%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels Midland, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Archer-Daniels Midland.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.718, which suggesting that the stock is 28.225% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.193, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.272%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 28.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $19.9B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $773.7M. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $18M is lower than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $28.6M. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.32x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 20.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.29x versus 0.87x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.