ADM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bunge Global SA has a net margin of 1.46% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of 1.73%. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 6.04% beat Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 9.73%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of $49.10, signalling downside risk potential of -8.41%. On the other hand Bunge Global SA has an analysts' consensus of $89.71 which suggests that it could grow by 5.07%. Given that Bunge Global SA has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels Midland, analysts believe Bunge Global SA is more attractive than Archer-Daniels Midland.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.673, which suggesting that the stock is 32.706% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.847%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.77%. Bunge Global SA offers a yield of 3.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 54.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Bunge Global SA pays out 33.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $20.2B, which are larger than Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues of $11.6B. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $295M is higher than Bunge Global SA's net income of $201M. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.15x while Bunge Global SA's PE ratio is 10.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.31x versus 0.23x for Bunge Global SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kellanova has a net margin of 1.46% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of 9.86%. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 6.04% beat Kellanova's return on equity of 37.56%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of $49.10, signalling downside risk potential of -8.41%. On the other hand Kellanova has an analysts' consensus of $83.39 which suggests that it could grow by 6%. Given that Kellanova has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels Midland, analysts believe Kellanova is more attractive than Archer-Daniels Midland.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.673, which suggesting that the stock is 32.706% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kellanova has a beta of 0.298, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.178%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.77%. Kellanova offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 54.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Kellanova pays out 57.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $20.2B, which are larger than Kellanova quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $295M is lower than Kellanova's net income of $304M. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.15x while Kellanova's PE ratio is 19.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.31x versus 2.17x for Kellanova. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media has a net margin of 1.46% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of --. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 6.04% beat RegalWorks Media's return on equity of --.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of $49.10, signalling downside risk potential of -8.41%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Archer-Daniels Midland has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, analysts believe Archer-Daniels Midland is more attractive than RegalWorks Media.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.673, which suggesting that the stock is 32.706% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media has a beta of -0.750, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 175.028%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.77%. RegalWorks Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 54.72% of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Archer-Daniels Midland's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $20.2B, which are larger than RegalWorks Media quarterly revenues of --. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $295M is higher than RegalWorks Media's net income of --. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.15x while RegalWorks Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.31x versus -- for RegalWorks Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 1.46% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of 0.13%. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 6.04% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 2.84%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of $49.10, signalling downside risk potential of -8.41%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $83.57 which suggests that it could grow by 60.41%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels Midland, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Archer-Daniels Midland.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.673, which suggesting that the stock is 32.706% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.933, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.666%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.77%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 3.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 54.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $20.2B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $675.7M. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $295M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $900K. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.15x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 24.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.31x versus 0.50x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.