ADM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bunge Global SA has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of 4.45%. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 7.82% beat Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 10.07%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of $49.82, signalling upside risk potential of 8%. On the other hand Bunge Global SA has an analysts' consensus of $87.23 which suggests that it could grow by 14.21%. Given that Bunge Global SA has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels Midland, analysts believe Bunge Global SA is more attractive than Archer-Daniels Midland.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.585% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.583, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.678%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. Bunge Global SA offers a yield of 3.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 54.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Bunge Global SA pays out 33.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $21.5B, which are larger than Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues of $13.5B. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $567M is lower than Bunge Global SA's net income of $602M. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.78x while Bunge Global SA's PE ratio is 9.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.27x versus 0.20x for Bunge Global SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Estee Lauder Companies has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of -14.74%. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 7.82% beat The Estee Lauder Companies's return on equity of -12.63%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of $49.82, signalling upside risk potential of 8%. On the other hand The Estee Lauder Companies has an analysts' consensus of $72.76 which suggests that it could grow by 38.16%. Given that The Estee Lauder Companies has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels Midland, analysts believe The Estee Lauder Companies is more attractive than Archer-Daniels Midland.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.585% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Estee Lauder Companies has a beta of 1.100, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.016%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. The Estee Lauder Companies offers a yield of 3.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 54.72% of its earnings as a dividend. The Estee Lauder Companies pays out 242.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Archer-Daniels Midland's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Estee Lauder Companies's is not.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $21.5B, which are larger than The Estee Lauder Companies quarterly revenues of $4B. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $567M is higher than The Estee Lauder Companies's net income of -$590M. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.78x while The Estee Lauder Companies's PE ratio is 124.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.27x versus 1.25x for The Estee Lauder Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of --. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 7.82% beat RegalWorks Media's return on equity of --.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of $49.82, signalling upside risk potential of 8%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Archer-Daniels Midland has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, analysts believe Archer-Daniels Midland is more attractive than RegalWorks Media.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.585% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media has a beta of -0.324, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 132.446%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. RegalWorks Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 54.72% of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Archer-Daniels Midland's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $21.5B, which are larger than RegalWorks Media quarterly revenues of --. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $567M is higher than RegalWorks Media's net income of --. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.78x while RegalWorks Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.27x versus -- for RegalWorks Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of 3.36%. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 7.82% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of $49.82, signalling upside risk potential of 8%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $95.88 which suggests that it could grow by 68.43%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels Midland, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Archer-Daniels Midland.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.585% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.030, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.002%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 3.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 54.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $21.5B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $700.2M. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $567M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $23.5M. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.78x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 14.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.27x versus 0.58x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.