K Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Hershey has a net margin of 9.86% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 7.99%. Kellanova's return on equity of 37.56% beat The Hershey's return on equity of 37.93%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.40, signalling upside risk potential of 4.35%. On the other hand The Hershey has an analysts' consensus of $167.36 which suggests that it could fall by -2.3%. Given that Kellanova has higher upside potential than The Hershey, analysts believe Kellanova is more attractive than The Hershey.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.284, which suggesting that the stock is 71.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hershey has a beta of 0.300, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.956%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. The Hershey offers a yield of 3.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share. Kellanova pays 57.78% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hershey pays out 48.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than The Hershey quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Kellanova's net income of $304M is higher than The Hershey's net income of $224.2M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.18x while The Hershey's PE ratio is 21.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.20x versus 3.89x for The Hershey. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 9.86% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 11.87%. Kellanova's return on equity of 37.56% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.39%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.40, signalling upside risk potential of 4.35%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $31.28 which suggests that it could grow by 12.43%. Given that The Kraft Heinz has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe The Kraft Heinz is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.284, which suggesting that the stock is 71.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.252, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.802%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Kellanova pays 57.78% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6B. Kellanova's net income of $304M is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $712M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.18x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 12.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.20x versus 1.33x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WK Kellogg has a net margin of 9.86% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 2.72%. Kellanova's return on equity of 37.56% beat WK Kellogg's return on equity of 17.67%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.40, signalling upside risk potential of 4.35%. On the other hand WK Kellogg has an analysts' consensus of $22.70 which suggests that it could fall by -2.28%. Given that Kellanova has higher upside potential than WK Kellogg, analysts believe Kellanova is more attractive than WK Kellogg.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.284, which suggesting that the stock is 71.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WK Kellogg has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. WK Kellogg offers a yield of 2.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Kellanova pays 57.78% of its earnings as a dividend. WK Kellogg pays out 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than WK Kellogg quarterly revenues of $663M. Kellanova's net income of $304M is higher than WK Kellogg's net income of $18M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.18x while WK Kellogg's PE ratio is 36.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.20x versus 0.77x for WK Kellogg. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 9.86% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 5.56%. Kellanova's return on equity of 37.56% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 39.97%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.40, signalling upside risk potential of 4.35%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $153.97 which suggests that it could grow by 7.49%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.284, which suggesting that the stock is 71.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.454, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.552%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 3.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Kellanova pays 57.78% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $22.7B. Kellanova's net income of $304M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.18x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 26.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.20x versus 2.15x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.