K Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Mills has a net margin of 9.86% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 12.92%. Kellanova's return on equity of 37.56% beat General Mills's return on equity of 26.75%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.39, signalling upside risk potential of 1.01%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $62.05 which suggests that it could grow by 13.42%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.305, which suggesting that the stock is 69.51% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.047, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.326%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. General Mills offers a yield of 4.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Kellanova pays 57.78% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Kellanova's net income of $304M is lower than General Mills's net income of $625.6M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.85x while General Mills's PE ratio is 12.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.27x versus 1.57x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hershey has a net margin of 9.86% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 7.99%. Kellanova's return on equity of 37.56% beat The Hershey's return on equity of 37.93%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.39, signalling upside risk potential of 1.01%. On the other hand The Hershey has an analysts' consensus of $165.65 which suggests that it could fall by -2.63%. Given that Kellanova has higher upside potential than The Hershey, analysts believe Kellanova is more attractive than The Hershey.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.305, which suggesting that the stock is 69.51% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hershey has a beta of 0.318, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.25%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. The Hershey offers a yield of 3.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share. Kellanova pays 57.78% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hershey pays out 48.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than The Hershey quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Kellanova's net income of $304M is higher than The Hershey's net income of $224.2M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.85x while The Hershey's PE ratio is 20.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.27x versus 3.86x for The Hershey. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingredion has a net margin of 9.86% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 10.87%. Kellanova's return on equity of 37.56% beat Ingredion's return on equity of 16.04%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.39, signalling upside risk potential of 1.01%. On the other hand Ingredion has an analysts' consensus of $148.91 which suggests that it could grow by 9.74%. Given that Ingredion has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe Ingredion is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.305, which suggesting that the stock is 69.51% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingredion has a beta of 0.735, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.537%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Ingredion offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Kellanova pays 57.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingredion pays out 32.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Ingredion quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Kellanova's net income of $304M is higher than Ingredion's net income of $197M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.85x while Ingredion's PE ratio is 14.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.27x versus 1.22x for Ingredion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 9.86% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 29.92%. Kellanova's return on equity of 37.56% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.39, signalling upside risk potential of 1.01%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $77.48 which suggests that it could grow by 7.01%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.305, which suggesting that the stock is 69.51% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.474, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.575%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Kellanova pays 57.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.1B. Kellanova's net income of $304M is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.85x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 28.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.27x versus 6.67x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.