YZCFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

PetroChina has a net margin of 1.22% compared to Sinopec Oilfield Service's net margin of 6.22%. Sinopec Oilfield Service's return on equity of 7.65% beat PetroChina's return on equity of 9.71%.

Sinopec Oilfield Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PetroChina has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Oilfield Service has higher upside potential than PetroChina, analysts believe Sinopec Oilfield Service is more attractive than PetroChina.

Sinopec Oilfield Service has a beta of 0.261, which suggesting that the stock is 73.946% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PetroChina has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.041%.

Sinopec Oilfield Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PetroChina offers a yield of 7.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Sinopec Oilfield Service pays 106.56% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina pays out 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sinopec Oilfield Service's is not.

Sinopec Oilfield Service quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than PetroChina quarterly revenues of $103.5B. Sinopec Oilfield Service's net income of $30M is lower than PetroChina's net income of $6.4B. Notably, Sinopec Oilfield Service's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.37x while PetroChina's PE ratio is 6.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Oilfield Service is -- versus 0.39x for PetroChina. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Recon Technology has a net margin of 1.22% compared to Sinopec Oilfield Service's net margin of --. Sinopec Oilfield Service's return on equity of 7.65% beat Recon Technology's return on equity of -11.14%.

Sinopec Oilfield Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Recon Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Oilfield Service has higher upside potential than Recon Technology, analysts believe Sinopec Oilfield Service is more attractive than Recon Technology.

Sinopec Oilfield Service has a beta of 0.261, which suggesting that the stock is 73.946% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Recon Technology has a beta of 1.473, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.283%.

Sinopec Oilfield Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Recon Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Oilfield Service pays 106.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Recon Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sinopec Oilfield Service quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Recon Technology quarterly revenues of --. Sinopec Oilfield Service's net income of $30M is higher than Recon Technology's net income of --. Notably, Sinopec Oilfield Service's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.37x while Recon Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Oilfield Service is -- versus 3.10x for Recon Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Petroleum & Chemical has a net margin of 1.22% compared to Sinopec Oilfield Service's net margin of 1.02%. Sinopec Oilfield Service's return on equity of 7.65% beat China Petroleum & Chemical's return on equity of 6.14%.

Sinopec Oilfield Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Petroleum & Chemical has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Oilfield Service has higher upside potential than China Petroleum & Chemical, analysts believe Sinopec Oilfield Service is more attractive than China Petroleum & Chemical.

Sinopec Oilfield Service has a beta of 0.261, which suggesting that the stock is 73.946% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Petroleum & Chemical has a beta of 0.437, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.342%.

Sinopec Oilfield Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Petroleum & Chemical offers a yield of 9.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Sinopec Oilfield Service pays 106.56% of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical pays out 86.04% of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sinopec Oilfield Service's is not.

Sinopec Oilfield Service quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than China Petroleum & Chemical quarterly revenues of $110.4B. Sinopec Oilfield Service's net income of $30M is lower than China Petroleum & Chemical's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Sinopec Oilfield Service's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.37x while China Petroleum & Chemical's PE ratio is 9.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Oilfield Service is -- versus 0.15x for China Petroleum & Chemical. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.