PCCYF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Recon Technology has a net margin of 6.22% compared to PetroChina's net margin of --. PetroChina's return on equity of 9.71% beat Recon Technology's return on equity of -11.14%.

PetroChina has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Recon Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PetroChina has higher upside potential than Recon Technology, analysts believe PetroChina is more attractive than Recon Technology.

PetroChina has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.339% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Recon Technology has a beta of 1.681, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.085%.

PetroChina has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.29%. Recon Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PetroChina pays 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Recon Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PetroChina quarterly revenues are $103.5B, which are larger than Recon Technology quarterly revenues of --. PetroChina's net income of $6.4B is higher than Recon Technology's net income of --. Notably, PetroChina's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.16x while Recon Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PetroChina is 0.41x versus 3.36x for Recon Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Petroleum & Chemical has a net margin of 6.22% compared to PetroChina's net margin of 1.02%. PetroChina's return on equity of 9.71% beat China Petroleum & Chemical's return on equity of 6.14%.

PetroChina has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Petroleum & Chemical has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PetroChina has higher upside potential than China Petroleum & Chemical, analysts believe PetroChina is more attractive than China Petroleum & Chemical.

PetroChina has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.339% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Petroleum & Chemical has a beta of 0.437, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.26%.

PetroChina has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.29%. China Petroleum & Chemical offers a yield of 12.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. PetroChina pays 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical pays out 86.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PetroChina quarterly revenues are $103.5B, which are smaller than China Petroleum & Chemical quarterly revenues of $110.4B. PetroChina's net income of $6.4B is higher than China Petroleum & Chemical's net income of $1.1B. Notably, PetroChina's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.16x while China Petroleum & Chemical's PE ratio is 9.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PetroChina is 0.41x versus 0.15x for China Petroleum & Chemical. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sinopec Oilfield Service has a net margin of 6.22% compared to PetroChina's net margin of 1.22%. PetroChina's return on equity of 9.71% beat Sinopec Oilfield Service's return on equity of 7.65%.

PetroChina has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Oilfield Service has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PetroChina has higher upside potential than Sinopec Oilfield Service, analysts believe PetroChina is more attractive than Sinopec Oilfield Service.

PetroChina has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.339% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Oilfield Service has a beta of 0.417, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.346%.

PetroChina has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.29%. Sinopec Oilfield Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PetroChina pays 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Oilfield Service pays out 106.56% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sinopec Oilfield Service's is not.

PetroChina quarterly revenues are $103.5B, which are larger than Sinopec Oilfield Service quarterly revenues of $2.5B. PetroChina's net income of $6.4B is higher than Sinopec Oilfield Service's net income of $30M. Notably, PetroChina's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.16x while Sinopec Oilfield Service's PE ratio is 13.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PetroChina is 0.41x versus -- for Sinopec Oilfield Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.