RCON Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

PetroChina has a net margin of -- compared to Recon Technology's net margin of 6.22%. Recon Technology's return on equity of -11.14% beat PetroChina's return on equity of 9.71%.

Recon Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PetroChina has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Recon Technology has higher upside potential than PetroChina, analysts believe Recon Technology is more attractive than PetroChina.

Recon Technology has a beta of 1.624, which suggesting that the stock is 62.388% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PetroChina has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.483%.

Recon Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PetroChina offers a yield of 7.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Recon Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina pays out 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Recon Technology quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PetroChina quarterly revenues of $103.5B. Recon Technology's net income of -- is lower than PetroChina's net income of $6.4B. Notably, Recon Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PetroChina's PE ratio is 6.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Recon Technology is 2.82x versus 0.39x for PetroChina. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Petroleum & Chemical has a net margin of -- compared to Recon Technology's net margin of 1.02%. Recon Technology's return on equity of -11.14% beat China Petroleum & Chemical's return on equity of 6.14%.

Recon Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Petroleum & Chemical has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Recon Technology has higher upside potential than China Petroleum & Chemical, analysts believe Recon Technology is more attractive than China Petroleum & Chemical.

Recon Technology has a beta of 1.624, which suggesting that the stock is 62.388% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Petroleum & Chemical has a beta of 0.437, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.325%.

Recon Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Petroleum & Chemical offers a yield of 9.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Recon Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical pays out 86.04% of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Recon Technology quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Petroleum & Chemical quarterly revenues of $110.4B. Recon Technology's net income of -- is lower than China Petroleum & Chemical's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Recon Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Petroleum & Chemical's PE ratio is 9.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Recon Technology is 2.82x versus 0.15x for China Petroleum & Chemical. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sinopec Oilfield Service has a net margin of -- compared to Recon Technology's net margin of 1.22%. Recon Technology's return on equity of -11.14% beat Sinopec Oilfield Service's return on equity of 7.65%.

Recon Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Oilfield Service has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Recon Technology has higher upside potential than Sinopec Oilfield Service, analysts believe Recon Technology is more attractive than Sinopec Oilfield Service.

Recon Technology has a beta of 1.624, which suggesting that the stock is 62.388% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Oilfield Service has a beta of 0.434, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.638%.

Recon Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sinopec Oilfield Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Recon Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Oilfield Service pays out 106.56% of its earnings as a dividend.

Recon Technology quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sinopec Oilfield Service quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Recon Technology's net income of -- is lower than Sinopec Oilfield Service's net income of $30M. Notably, Recon Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sinopec Oilfield Service's PE ratio is 13.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Recon Technology is 2.82x versus -- for Sinopec Oilfield Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.