SPTJF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

PetroChina has a net margin of -0.46% compared to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's net margin of 6.22%. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's return on equity of 0.58% beat PetroChina's return on equity of 9.71%.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PetroChina has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has higher upside potential than PetroChina, analysts believe Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical is more attractive than PetroChina.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a beta of 0.429, which suggesting that the stock is 57.144% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PetroChina has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.041%.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PetroChina offers a yield of 8.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical pays 30.92% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina pays out 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than PetroChina quarterly revenues of $103.5B. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's net income of -$12.3M is lower than PetroChina's net income of $6.4B. Notably, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 76.04x while PetroChina's PE ratio is 6.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical is 0.14x versus 0.36x for PetroChina. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Recon Technology has a net margin of -0.46% compared to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's net margin of --. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's return on equity of 0.58% beat Recon Technology's return on equity of -11.14%.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Recon Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has higher upside potential than Recon Technology, analysts believe Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical is more attractive than Recon Technology.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a beta of 0.429, which suggesting that the stock is 57.144% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Recon Technology has a beta of 1.473, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.283%.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Recon Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical pays 30.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Recon Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Recon Technology quarterly revenues of --. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's net income of -$12.3M is higher than Recon Technology's net income of --. Notably, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 76.04x while Recon Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical is 0.14x versus 3.06x for Recon Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sinopec Oilfield Service has a net margin of -0.46% compared to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's net margin of 1.22%. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's return on equity of 0.58% beat Sinopec Oilfield Service's return on equity of 7.65%.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Oilfield Service has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has higher upside potential than Sinopec Oilfield Service, analysts believe Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical is more attractive than Sinopec Oilfield Service.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a beta of 0.429, which suggesting that the stock is 57.144% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Oilfield Service has a beta of 0.261, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.946%.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sinopec Oilfield Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical pays 30.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Oilfield Service pays out 106.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sinopec Oilfield Service's is not.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Sinopec Oilfield Service quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's net income of -$12.3M is lower than Sinopec Oilfield Service's net income of $30M. Notably, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 76.04x while Sinopec Oilfield Service's PE ratio is 13.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical is 0.14x versus -- for Sinopec Oilfield Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.