RCRUY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Internet Initiative Japan has a net margin of 13.27% compared to Recruit Holdings's net margin of 7.67%. Recruit Holdings's return on equity of 19.87% beat Internet Initiative Japan's return on equity of 15.99%.

Recruit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Internet Initiative Japan has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Recruit Holdings has higher upside potential than Internet Initiative Japan, analysts believe Recruit Holdings is more attractive than Internet Initiative Japan.

Recruit Holdings has a beta of 1.589, which suggesting that the stock is 58.892% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Internet Initiative Japan has a beta of 1.026, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.564%.

Recruit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Internet Initiative Japan offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Recruit Holdings pays 10% of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan pays out 28.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Recruit Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are larger than Internet Initiative Japan quarterly revenues of $539.5M. Recruit Holdings's net income of $780.5M is higher than Internet Initiative Japan's net income of $41.4M. Notably, Recruit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.39x while Internet Initiative Japan's PE ratio is 23.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Recruit Holdings is 3.95x versus 1.61x for Internet Initiative Japan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KDDI has a net margin of 13.27% compared to Recruit Holdings's net margin of 12.29%. Recruit Holdings's return on equity of 19.87% beat KDDI's return on equity of 11.27%.

Recruit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KDDI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Recruit Holdings has higher upside potential than KDDI, analysts believe Recruit Holdings is more attractive than KDDI.

Recruit Holdings has a beta of 1.589, which suggesting that the stock is 58.892% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KDDI has a beta of 0.109, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.095%.

Recruit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. KDDI offers a yield of 2.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Recruit Holdings pays 10% of its earnings as a dividend. KDDI pays out 46.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Recruit Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are smaller than KDDI quarterly revenues of $9.9B. Recruit Holdings's net income of $780.5M is lower than KDDI's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Recruit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.39x while KDDI's PE ratio is 17.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Recruit Holdings is 3.95x versus 1.89x for KDDI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PicoCELA has a net margin of 13.27% compared to Recruit Holdings's net margin of --. Recruit Holdings's return on equity of 19.87% beat PicoCELA's return on equity of --.

Recruit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PicoCELA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Recruit Holdings has higher upside potential than PicoCELA, analysts believe Recruit Holdings is more attractive than PicoCELA.

Recruit Holdings has a beta of 1.589, which suggesting that the stock is 58.892% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PicoCELA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Recruit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. PicoCELA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Recruit Holdings pays 10% of its earnings as a dividend. PicoCELA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Recruit Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Recruit Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are larger than PicoCELA quarterly revenues of --. Recruit Holdings's net income of $780.5M is higher than PicoCELA's net income of --. Notably, Recruit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.39x while PicoCELA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Recruit Holdings is 3.95x versus 2.36x for PicoCELA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TNL Mediagene has a net margin of 13.27% compared to Recruit Holdings's net margin of --. Recruit Holdings's return on equity of 19.87% beat TNL Mediagene's return on equity of --.

Recruit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TNL Mediagene has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Recruit Holdings has higher upside potential than TNL Mediagene, analysts believe Recruit Holdings is more attractive than TNL Mediagene.

Recruit Holdings has a beta of 1.589, which suggesting that the stock is 58.892% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TNL Mediagene has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Recruit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. TNL Mediagene offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Recruit Holdings pays 10% of its earnings as a dividend. TNL Mediagene pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Recruit Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Recruit Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are larger than TNL Mediagene quarterly revenues of --. Recruit Holdings's net income of $780.5M is higher than TNL Mediagene's net income of --. Notably, Recruit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.39x while TNL Mediagene's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Recruit Holdings is 3.95x versus -- for TNL Mediagene. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.