RCRUY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Internet Initiative Japan has a net margin of 11.81% compared to Recruit Holdings's net margin of 5.53%. Recruit Holdings's return on equity of 18.7% beat Internet Initiative Japan's return on equity of 15.18%.

Recruit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Internet Initiative Japan has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Recruit Holdings has higher upside potential than Internet Initiative Japan, analysts believe Recruit Holdings is more attractive than Internet Initiative Japan.

Recruit Holdings has a beta of 1.543, which suggesting that the stock is 54.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Internet Initiative Japan has a beta of 0.689, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.078%.

Recruit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. Internet Initiative Japan offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Recruit Holdings pays 10% of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan pays out 28.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Recruit Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.8B, which are larger than Internet Initiative Japan quarterly revenues of $505M. Recruit Holdings's net income of $682.7M is higher than Internet Initiative Japan's net income of $27.9M. Notably, Recruit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.66x while Internet Initiative Japan's PE ratio is 25.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Recruit Holdings is 4.77x versus 1.65x for Internet Initiative Japan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KDDI has a net margin of 11.81% compared to Recruit Holdings's net margin of 12.74%. Recruit Holdings's return on equity of 18.7% beat KDDI's return on equity of 11.1%.

Recruit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KDDI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Recruit Holdings has higher upside potential than KDDI, analysts believe Recruit Holdings is more attractive than KDDI.

Recruit Holdings has a beta of 1.543, which suggesting that the stock is 54.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KDDI has a beta of 0.053, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.652%.

Recruit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. KDDI offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Recruit Holdings pays 10% of its earnings as a dividend. KDDI pays out 46.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Recruit Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.8B, which are smaller than KDDI quarterly revenues of $8.9B. Recruit Holdings's net income of $682.7M is lower than KDDI's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Recruit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.66x while KDDI's PE ratio is 15.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Recruit Holdings is 4.77x versus 1.69x for KDDI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a net margin of 11.81% compared to Recruit Holdings's net margin of 8.46%. Recruit Holdings's return on equity of 18.7% beat Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's return on equity of 12.71%.

Recruit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 33.57%. Given that Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has higher upside potential than Recruit Holdings, analysts believe Nippon Telegraph & Telephone is more attractive than Recruit Holdings.

Recruit Holdings has a beta of 1.543, which suggesting that the stock is 54.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a beta of 0.136, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.403%.

Recruit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone offers a yield of 3.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Recruit Holdings pays 10% of its earnings as a dividend. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone pays out 32.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Recruit Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.8B, which are smaller than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone quarterly revenues of $20.8B. Recruit Holdings's net income of $682.7M is lower than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Recruit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.66x while Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's PE ratio is 10.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Recruit Holdings is 4.77x versus 0.91x for Nippon Telegraph & Telephone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TNL Mediagene has a net margin of 11.81% compared to Recruit Holdings's net margin of --. Recruit Holdings's return on equity of 18.7% beat TNL Mediagene's return on equity of --.

Recruit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TNL Mediagene has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Recruit Holdings has higher upside potential than TNL Mediagene, analysts believe Recruit Holdings is more attractive than TNL Mediagene.

Recruit Holdings has a beta of 1.543, which suggesting that the stock is 54.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TNL Mediagene has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Recruit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. TNL Mediagene offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Recruit Holdings pays 10% of its earnings as a dividend. TNL Mediagene pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Recruit Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Recruit Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.8B, which are larger than TNL Mediagene quarterly revenues of --. Recruit Holdings's net income of $682.7M is higher than TNL Mediagene's net income of --. Notably, Recruit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.66x while TNL Mediagene's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Recruit Holdings is 4.77x versus -- for TNL Mediagene. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.