BLMZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

KDDI has a net margin of -- compared to BloomZ's net margin of 12.29%. BloomZ's return on equity of -16.01% beat KDDI's return on equity of 11.82%.

BloomZ has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KDDI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BloomZ has higher upside potential than KDDI, analysts believe BloomZ is more attractive than KDDI.

BloomZ has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KDDI has a beta of 0.093, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.671%.

BloomZ has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KDDI offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. BloomZ pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KDDI pays out 41.84% of its earnings as a dividend. KDDI's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BloomZ quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KDDI quarterly revenues of $9.9B. BloomZ's net income of -- is lower than KDDI's net income of $1.2B. Notably, BloomZ's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KDDI's PE ratio is 14.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BloomZ is 1.47x versus 1.73x for KDDI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a net margin of -- compared to BloomZ's net margin of 8.55%. BloomZ's return on equity of -16.01% beat Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's return on equity of 8.87%.

BloomZ has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BloomZ has higher upside potential than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone, analysts believe BloomZ is more attractive than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone.

BloomZ has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a beta of 0.242, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.765%.

BloomZ has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone offers a yield of 3.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. BloomZ pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BloomZ quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone quarterly revenues of $22.7B. BloomZ's net income of -- is lower than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net income of $1.9B. Notably, BloomZ's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's PE ratio is 12.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BloomZ is 1.47x versus 0.93x for Nippon Telegraph & Telephone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PicoCELA has a net margin of -- compared to BloomZ's net margin of --. BloomZ's return on equity of -16.01% beat PicoCELA's return on equity of --.

BloomZ has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PicoCELA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BloomZ has higher upside potential than PicoCELA, analysts believe BloomZ is more attractive than PicoCELA.

BloomZ has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PicoCELA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BloomZ has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PicoCELA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BloomZ pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PicoCELA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BloomZ quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PicoCELA quarterly revenues of --. BloomZ's net income of -- is lower than PicoCELA's net income of --. Notably, BloomZ's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PicoCELA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BloomZ is 1.47x versus 4.51x for PicoCELA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TNL Mediagene has a net margin of -- compared to BloomZ's net margin of --. BloomZ's return on equity of -16.01% beat TNL Mediagene's return on equity of --.

BloomZ has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TNL Mediagene has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BloomZ has higher upside potential than TNL Mediagene, analysts believe BloomZ is more attractive than TNL Mediagene.

BloomZ has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TNL Mediagene has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BloomZ has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TNL Mediagene offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BloomZ pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TNL Mediagene pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BloomZ quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TNL Mediagene quarterly revenues of --. BloomZ's net income of -- is lower than TNL Mediagene's net income of --. Notably, BloomZ's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TNL Mediagene's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BloomZ is 1.47x versus -- for TNL Mediagene. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.