PCLA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Internet Initiative Japan has a net margin of -- compared to PicoCELA's net margin of 7.02%. PicoCELA's return on equity of -- beat Internet Initiative Japan's return on equity of 14.92%.

PicoCELA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Internet Initiative Japan has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PicoCELA has higher upside potential than Internet Initiative Japan, analysts believe PicoCELA is more attractive than Internet Initiative Japan.

PicoCELA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Internet Initiative Japan has a beta of 1.026, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.564%.

PicoCELA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Internet Initiative Japan offers a yield of 1.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. PicoCELA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan pays out 30.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PicoCELA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Internet Initiative Japan quarterly revenues of $574M. PicoCELA's net income of -- is lower than Internet Initiative Japan's net income of $40.3M. Notably, PicoCELA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Internet Initiative Japan's PE ratio is 24.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PicoCELA is 2.62x versus 1.54x for Internet Initiative Japan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KDDI has a net margin of -- compared to PicoCELA's net margin of 12.29%. PicoCELA's return on equity of -- beat KDDI's return on equity of 11.82%.

PicoCELA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KDDI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PicoCELA has higher upside potential than KDDI, analysts believe PicoCELA is more attractive than KDDI.

PicoCELA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KDDI has a beta of 0.109, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.095%.

PicoCELA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KDDI offers a yield of 2.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. PicoCELA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KDDI pays out 41.84% of its earnings as a dividend. KDDI's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PicoCELA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KDDI quarterly revenues of $9.9B. PicoCELA's net income of -- is lower than KDDI's net income of $1.2B. Notably, PicoCELA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KDDI's PE ratio is 15.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PicoCELA is 2.62x versus 1.80x for KDDI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a net margin of -- compared to PicoCELA's net margin of 8.55%. PicoCELA's return on equity of -- beat Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's return on equity of 8.87%.

PicoCELA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PicoCELA has higher upside potential than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone, analysts believe PicoCELA is more attractive than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone.

PicoCELA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a beta of 0.178, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.179%.

PicoCELA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. PicoCELA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PicoCELA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone quarterly revenues of $22.7B. PicoCELA's net income of -- is lower than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net income of $1.9B. Notably, PicoCELA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's PE ratio is 13.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PicoCELA is 2.62x versus 0.96x for Nippon Telegraph & Telephone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TNL Mediagene has a net margin of -- compared to PicoCELA's net margin of --. PicoCELA's return on equity of -- beat TNL Mediagene's return on equity of --.

PicoCELA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TNL Mediagene has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PicoCELA has higher upside potential than TNL Mediagene, analysts believe PicoCELA is more attractive than TNL Mediagene.

PicoCELA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TNL Mediagene has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PicoCELA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TNL Mediagene offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PicoCELA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TNL Mediagene pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PicoCELA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TNL Mediagene quarterly revenues of --. PicoCELA's net income of -- is lower than TNL Mediagene's net income of --. Notably, PicoCELA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TNL Mediagene's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PicoCELA is 2.62x versus -- for TNL Mediagene. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.