IIJIY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

KDDI has a net margin of 7.02% compared to Internet Initiative Japan's net margin of 12.29%. Internet Initiative Japan's return on equity of 14.92% beat KDDI's return on equity of 11.82%.

Internet Initiative Japan has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KDDI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Internet Initiative Japan has higher upside potential than KDDI, analysts believe Internet Initiative Japan is more attractive than KDDI.

Internet Initiative Japan has a beta of 1.026, which suggesting that the stock is 2.564% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KDDI has a beta of 0.109, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.095%.

Internet Initiative Japan has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.24%. KDDI offers a yield of 2.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Internet Initiative Japan pays 30.77% of its earnings as a dividend. KDDI pays out 41.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Internet Initiative Japan quarterly revenues are $574M, which are smaller than KDDI quarterly revenues of $9.9B. Internet Initiative Japan's net income of $40.3M is lower than KDDI's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Internet Initiative Japan's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.44x while KDDI's PE ratio is 15.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Internet Initiative Japan is 1.54x versus 1.78x for KDDI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a net margin of 7.02% compared to Internet Initiative Japan's net margin of 8.55%. Internet Initiative Japan's return on equity of 14.92% beat Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's return on equity of 8.87%.

Internet Initiative Japan has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Internet Initiative Japan has higher upside potential than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone, analysts believe Internet Initiative Japan is more attractive than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone.

Internet Initiative Japan has a beta of 1.026, which suggesting that the stock is 2.564% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a beta of 0.178, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.179%.

Internet Initiative Japan has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.24%. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone offers a yield of 3.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Internet Initiative Japan pays 30.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Internet Initiative Japan quarterly revenues are $574M, which are smaller than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone quarterly revenues of $22.7B. Internet Initiative Japan's net income of $40.3M is lower than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Internet Initiative Japan's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.44x while Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's PE ratio is 13.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Internet Initiative Japan is 1.54x versus 1.00x for Nippon Telegraph & Telephone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PicoCELA has a net margin of 7.02% compared to Internet Initiative Japan's net margin of --. Internet Initiative Japan's return on equity of 14.92% beat PicoCELA's return on equity of --.

Internet Initiative Japan has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PicoCELA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Internet Initiative Japan has higher upside potential than PicoCELA, analysts believe Internet Initiative Japan is more attractive than PicoCELA.

Internet Initiative Japan has a beta of 1.026, which suggesting that the stock is 2.564% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PicoCELA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Internet Initiative Japan has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.24%. PicoCELA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Internet Initiative Japan pays 30.77% of its earnings as a dividend. PicoCELA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Internet Initiative Japan quarterly revenues are $574M, which are larger than PicoCELA quarterly revenues of --. Internet Initiative Japan's net income of $40.3M is higher than PicoCELA's net income of --. Notably, Internet Initiative Japan's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.44x while PicoCELA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Internet Initiative Japan is 1.54x versus 3.29x for PicoCELA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TNL Mediagene has a net margin of 7.02% compared to Internet Initiative Japan's net margin of --. Internet Initiative Japan's return on equity of 14.92% beat TNL Mediagene's return on equity of --.

Internet Initiative Japan has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TNL Mediagene has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Internet Initiative Japan has higher upside potential than TNL Mediagene, analysts believe Internet Initiative Japan is more attractive than TNL Mediagene.

Internet Initiative Japan has a beta of 1.026, which suggesting that the stock is 2.564% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TNL Mediagene has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Internet Initiative Japan has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.24%. TNL Mediagene offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Internet Initiative Japan pays 30.77% of its earnings as a dividend. TNL Mediagene pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Internet Initiative Japan quarterly revenues are $574M, which are larger than TNL Mediagene quarterly revenues of --. Internet Initiative Japan's net income of $40.3M is higher than TNL Mediagene's net income of --. Notably, Internet Initiative Japan's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.44x while TNL Mediagene's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Internet Initiative Japan is 1.54x versus -- for TNL Mediagene. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.